By Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON - Two F-16 fighter jets intercepted a civilian aircraft this morning near Muncie, Ind., at the North American Aerospace Defense Command's direction and escorted it and its unconscious pilot until they crashed, NORAD officials reported.
NORAD scrambled the Air National Guard F-16s at about 9:30 a.m. Mountain time to intercept a Mooney, single-engine aircraft when it failed to respond to radio calls. The F-16 pilots reported the civilian pilot appeared to be unresponsive. They escorted the aircraft until it crashed at about 10:40 a.m. Mountain time in a rural area of Randolph County, Ind., Air Force Capt. Sharbe Clark, a NORAD spokesman said.
The civilian aircraft was not believed to be part of any terrorist activity, Clark said. It left Grand Rapids, Mich., on a post-maintenance flight and had been in contact with ground air traffic controllers before the communication lines stopped.
The F-16s escorted the aircraft, trying to re-establish communications with the pilot and monitoring its erratic flight as it continued to lose altitude, Clark said.
First responders and local law enforcement responded to the scene. No information is yet available about the fate of the pilot, and no injuries have been reported on the ground, according to Rachel Meyer of the Indiana Department of Homeland Security.
Meyer called military interceptions an important element of homeland security.
Military interceptions typically are conducted to get the identified aircraft to re-establish communications with the local Federal Aviation Administration air traffic controllers and to direct them to land safely.
However, in cases like today's, the escorts monitor the aircraft's location and altitude and alert anyone in the area to help control the situation, Meyer said.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Hawaii Guard Deploys for Tsunami Relief
By Air Force Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, Special to American Forces Press Service
ARLINGTON, Va. - About 90 Hawaii National Guard members are on their way to American Samoa today to help in the recovery efforts on the Pacific island, National Guard officials announced.
An 8.4 magnitude earthquake struck the Samoa Islands region yesterday, causing a destructive tsunami with 15-to-20-foot waves striking the east side of American Samoa.
Flood levels were exceeded about one mile into the island. Local reports said 24 people were killed on American Samoa, and that buildings were damaged. The only hospital on the island, LBJ Tropical Hospital, reportedly has exceeded its maximum capacity.
Federal Emergency Management Agency officials asked the Hawaii National Guard to provide personnel from its civil support team, as well as its enhanced chemical and biological response force package, a command and control element and a mortuary affairs team.
"This support package was requested, put together and deployed in less than 24 hours," said Jack Harrison, director of communications and public affairs for the National Guard Bureau. "We do this every day. On average, more than a dozen governors every day will call on their National Guard to respond to contingencies that range from severe emergencies, like this, to white-powder scares."
These Guard members are expected to perform search and rescue missions, medical triage and treatment, command and control, and hazardous materials modeling support to the unified command team, he added.
Harrison said the deploying Guard members will be self-sustaining for 96 hours so they don't burden the American Samoa infrastructure.
The Tafuna International Airport initially was closed due to debris on the runways. However, a runway is now open, which will allow military flights to bring in the personnel and equipment from Hawaii.
Two C-17 Globemaster III transport jets from the 154th Wing, a reserve associate unit based in Hawaii, are scheduled to fly to the island today.
"The state of Hawaii is assisting Gov. [Togiola] Tulafono in the recovery effort, including medical assistance, communications support and engineers," Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle said in a statement yesterday.
In 2006, CH-47 Chinook helicopters from the Hawaii National Guard airlifted supplies from Oahu to isolated residents on Maui after a magnitude 6.7 earthquake struck the Hawaiian Islands in October.
ARLINGTON, Va. - About 90 Hawaii National Guard members are on their way to American Samoa today to help in the recovery efforts on the Pacific island, National Guard officials announced.
An 8.4 magnitude earthquake struck the Samoa Islands region yesterday, causing a destructive tsunami with 15-to-20-foot waves striking the east side of American Samoa.
Flood levels were exceeded about one mile into the island. Local reports said 24 people were killed on American Samoa, and that buildings were damaged. The only hospital on the island, LBJ Tropical Hospital, reportedly has exceeded its maximum capacity.
Federal Emergency Management Agency officials asked the Hawaii National Guard to provide personnel from its civil support team, as well as its enhanced chemical and biological response force package, a command and control element and a mortuary affairs team.
"This support package was requested, put together and deployed in less than 24 hours," said Jack Harrison, director of communications and public affairs for the National Guard Bureau. "We do this every day. On average, more than a dozen governors every day will call on their National Guard to respond to contingencies that range from severe emergencies, like this, to white-powder scares."
These Guard members are expected to perform search and rescue missions, medical triage and treatment, command and control, and hazardous materials modeling support to the unified command team, he added.
Harrison said the deploying Guard members will be self-sustaining for 96 hours so they don't burden the American Samoa infrastructure.
The Tafuna International Airport initially was closed due to debris on the runways. However, a runway is now open, which will allow military flights to bring in the personnel and equipment from Hawaii.
Two C-17 Globemaster III transport jets from the 154th Wing, a reserve associate unit based in Hawaii, are scheduled to fly to the island today.
"The state of Hawaii is assisting Gov. [Togiola] Tulafono in the recovery effort, including medical assistance, communications support and engineers," Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle said in a statement yesterday.
In 2006, CH-47 Chinook helicopters from the Hawaii National Guard airlifted supplies from Oahu to isolated residents on Maui after a magnitude 6.7 earthquake struck the Hawaiian Islands in October.
Fighters Respond to Intercept Aircraft
PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo., Two F-16 fighters under the direction of North American Aerospace Defense Command intercepted a single-engine aircraft at about 10 a.m. EDT today near Muncie, Ind.
NORAD officials said they don't believe the incident is terrorism-related.
The Indiana Air National Guard F-16s are escorting the aircraft, which has not responded to radio calls. The F-16 pilots escorting the plane reported the pilot is unresponsive.
The civilian aircraft left Grand Rapids, Mich., on a post-maintenance flight and lost communications with ground air traffic controllers. At last report, it was flying generally south 60 miles northeast of Indianapolis, and may have been losing altitude.
The intent of military intercepts is to have the identified aircraft
re-establish communications with local Federal Aviation Administration air traffic controllers and instruct the pilot to follow air traffic controllers' instructions to land safely for further follow-on action, officials said.
NORAD is a bi-national Canadian and American command that is responsible for the air defense of North America and maritime warning.
NORAD officials said they don't believe the incident is terrorism-related.
The Indiana Air National Guard F-16s are escorting the aircraft, which has not responded to radio calls. The F-16 pilots escorting the plane reported the pilot is unresponsive.
The civilian aircraft left Grand Rapids, Mich., on a post-maintenance flight and lost communications with ground air traffic controllers. At last report, it was flying generally south 60 miles northeast of Indianapolis, and may have been losing altitude.
The intent of military intercepts is to have the identified aircraft
re-establish communications with local Federal Aviation Administration air traffic controllers and instruct the pilot to follow air traffic controllers' instructions to land safely for further follow-on action, officials said.
NORAD is a bi-national Canadian and American command that is responsible for the air defense of North America and maritime warning.
Iraqi Air Force Assumes Control of C-130 Operations
NEW AL-MUTHANA AIR BASE, Iraq - The Iraqi air force officially began fully independent C-130 air operations yesterday, marking the end of the U.S. C-130 air advisory mission here.
A ceremony deactivating the U.S. Air Force's 321st Air Expeditionary Advisory Squadron and marking assumption of C-130 operations, maintenance and training by the Iraqi air force's Squadron 23 formalized the milestone.
Presiding over the event were U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Robert C. Kane, commander of the 321st Air Expeditionary Wing and director of the Air Force's Iraq training and advisory mission; Staff Lt. Gen. Anwar Hamad Amen Ahmed, Iraqi air force commander; Brig. Gen. Kareem Ali Abud, commander of the Iraqi air force's New Al-Muthana Air Base; and Col. Christopher Pehrson, commander of the U.S. Air Force's 321st Air Expeditionary Advisory Group.
"Today, I say we are proud to have had the honor to work with you side by side as brothers, not less," Kareem said. "I have worked with about eight advisors, and we have here more than 60 groups at Al-Mathana, great in all fields: discipline, versatility, specialties and, more than that, humanity.
"We can't forget the support you gave in the training of pilots, craft engineers, logistics, security forces and English classes," he continued. "We respect your sacrifices -- leaving your families behind just to support Iraqi air forces. We are grateful for you and your families. We don't like to say goodbye. See you again with better situations in Iraq."
The deactivation of the U.S. squadron marked another claim to the Iraqi air force's independence.
Squadron 23 is the largest C-130 squadron in the Iraqi air force, and its mission includes delivering troops and cargo, supporting distinguished visitors and flying medical evacuation missions. The squadron began after the United States gave three C-130E aircraft to the Iraqis through the Excess Defense Articles program.
The Iraqi air force C-130 airlift mission was born with the arrival in January 2005 of those same three aircraft at Ali Air Base. This paved the way for the first aircrew members to receive flight training at Little Rock Air Force Base, Ark. After being assigned to Ali Air Base since 2005, the squadron moved here March 7, 2006.
In his remarks, Kane declared the C-130 flight training effort "mission complete."
"The Iraqi pilots, navigators, flight engineers, loadmasters, and maintainers have clearly demonstrated that they are ready to perform their missions and, most importantly, to do it well," he said. "American advisors have also done what we've asked them to do: to stand side by side with their Iraqi partners and provide them the training required to operate the C-130 safely. This is a big deal -- something the people of Iraq, and even the world, will take note of. The Iraqi air force is on its way to independent operations."
In his comments, Pehrson noted the milestone's importance. "Today's ceremony is possible because the United States Air Force and the Iraqi air force were successful in their partnership to develop credible, professional and enduring airlift capability in the Iraqi C-130 fleet," he said. "It's an important step in the realization of a fully independent Iraqi air force that will one day defend and protect the people of Iraq.
"From today forward, Squadron 23 will fly independently over the skies of Iraq without direct support from a U.S. air advisory squadron," he added. "One day soon, other squadrons throughout the Iraqi air force will also operate independent of American advisor support. This change, and the evolution of the air advisory mission, is good because it means that we are moving together beyond foundational training and towards air power capabilities that are credible and enduring."
Air advisory training included a focus on foundational training for pilots, navigators, flight engineers, loadmasters, crew chiefs and maintenance specialists in engines, sheet metal, avionics and hydraulics.
A ceremony deactivating the U.S. Air Force's 321st Air Expeditionary Advisory Squadron and marking assumption of C-130 operations, maintenance and training by the Iraqi air force's Squadron 23 formalized the milestone.
Presiding over the event were U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Robert C. Kane, commander of the 321st Air Expeditionary Wing and director of the Air Force's Iraq training and advisory mission; Staff Lt. Gen. Anwar Hamad Amen Ahmed, Iraqi air force commander; Brig. Gen. Kareem Ali Abud, commander of the Iraqi air force's New Al-Muthana Air Base; and Col. Christopher Pehrson, commander of the U.S. Air Force's 321st Air Expeditionary Advisory Group.
"Today, I say we are proud to have had the honor to work with you side by side as brothers, not less," Kareem said. "I have worked with about eight advisors, and we have here more than 60 groups at Al-Mathana, great in all fields: discipline, versatility, specialties and, more than that, humanity.
"We can't forget the support you gave in the training of pilots, craft engineers, logistics, security forces and English classes," he continued. "We respect your sacrifices -- leaving your families behind just to support Iraqi air forces. We are grateful for you and your families. We don't like to say goodbye. See you again with better situations in Iraq."
The deactivation of the U.S. squadron marked another claim to the Iraqi air force's independence.
Squadron 23 is the largest C-130 squadron in the Iraqi air force, and its mission includes delivering troops and cargo, supporting distinguished visitors and flying medical evacuation missions. The squadron began after the United States gave three C-130E aircraft to the Iraqis through the Excess Defense Articles program.
The Iraqi air force C-130 airlift mission was born with the arrival in January 2005 of those same three aircraft at Ali Air Base. This paved the way for the first aircrew members to receive flight training at Little Rock Air Force Base, Ark. After being assigned to Ali Air Base since 2005, the squadron moved here March 7, 2006.
In his remarks, Kane declared the C-130 flight training effort "mission complete."
"The Iraqi pilots, navigators, flight engineers, loadmasters, and maintainers have clearly demonstrated that they are ready to perform their missions and, most importantly, to do it well," he said. "American advisors have also done what we've asked them to do: to stand side by side with their Iraqi partners and provide them the training required to operate the C-130 safely. This is a big deal -- something the people of Iraq, and even the world, will take note of. The Iraqi air force is on its way to independent operations."
In his comments, Pehrson noted the milestone's importance. "Today's ceremony is possible because the United States Air Force and the Iraqi air force were successful in their partnership to develop credible, professional and enduring airlift capability in the Iraqi C-130 fleet," he said. "It's an important step in the realization of a fully independent Iraqi air force that will one day defend and protect the people of Iraq.
"From today forward, Squadron 23 will fly independently over the skies of Iraq without direct support from a U.S. air advisory squadron," he added. "One day soon, other squadrons throughout the Iraqi air force will also operate independent of American advisor support. This change, and the evolution of the air advisory mission, is good because it means that we are moving together beyond foundational training and towards air power capabilities that are credible and enduring."
Air advisory training included a focus on foundational training for pilots, navigators, flight engineers, loadmasters, crew chiefs and maintenance specialists in engines, sheet metal, avionics and hydraulics.
NORAD To Conduct Flight Exercise Over DC Area
The North American Aerospace Defense Command and the Continental U.S. NORAD Region plans a training flight exercise over Washington.
The exercise, called Falcon Virgo 10-01, will take place late Wednesday and early Thursday. It will include air force F-16s and Coast Guard helicopters.
The exercise is made up of a series of training flights held in coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Capital Region Command Center, the Joint Air Defense Operations Center, the Continental U.S. NORAD Region (CONR), Civil Air Patrol, U.S. Coast Guard and CONR's Eastern Air Defense Sector.
U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Legare Returns From West African Deployment
USCGC LEGARE - The Coast Guard Cutter Legare and its crew will return to their homeport of Portsmouth, Va., Oct. 1.
The cutter has been operating along the West African coast since July 1 serving as the Africa Partnership Station platform for the Navy 6th Fleet. While there, the crew performed joint law enforcement operations with naval services and maritime enforcement agencies from Morocco, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Cape Verde.
The cutter's work in Sierra Leone produced the nation's largest ever maritime law enforcement case when a joint boarding team consisting of Legare crew and members of Sierra Leone's Maritime Wing boarded and seized the fishing vessel Yu Feng for illegally fishing in Sierra Leone's waters. Yu Feng's crew faces fines of $1 million and forfeiture of its catch and vessel. The Legare's crew also worked with members of Cape Verde's Coast Guard and Judiciary Police to perform five boardings resulting in one fine and conducted extensive joint operations with Moroccan and Senegalese Naval vessels which included the first ever joint Moroccan/United States law enforcement boarding and joint law enforcement exercises with an embarked Senegalese law enforcement detachment.
Legare's crew completed two community relations projects while deployed, painting classrooms at the Ndiaye School in Dakar, Senegal and the Children's Emergency Center in Praia, Cape Verde.
The official website of the USCG Cutter Legare (WMEC-9120 is located at
http://www.uscg.mil/lantarea/cgcLegare/default.asp
Truman CSG Completes JTFEX Training Evolutions off East Coast
The aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) and ships from participating nations take part in a NATO mine countermeasures exercise upon the completion of Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFX). JTFX is a scenario-driven tactical exercise supporting major combat operations for the Harry S. Truman Strike Group. The exercise provides training for the strike group to proceed into a Fleet Synthetic Training - Joint (FST-J) exercise for final deployment certification.(U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class David Danals/Released)NORFOLK, Va. (NNS) -- The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group (HST CSG), joined by 13 foreign ships from nine nations completed Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFEX) 09-4 Sept. 22.
JTFEX functions as a certification evolution designed to test the capabilities of multiple carrier strike groups operation in a multinational, joint environment. It evaluates how ships work together in a variety of tactical situations and ensures the strike group and its crew is ready for deployment.
"We've seen some great training in all our warfare areas, and the most impressive part was the integration of our coalition partners. The training we have received with them was just fantastic," said Rear Adm. Patrick Driscoll, the strike group's commander. "We completed a spectrum of warfare, from single-ship boardings on ships that are passing through our area, to high-level scenarios where we were being attacked by submarines, surface ships, and aircraft at the same time." JTFEX was a successful demonstration of teaming with allies and Partners, he added.
One area of warfare the strike group focused on was anti-submarine warfare (ASW).
"We had a great ASW threat presentation with the Italian submarine, ITS Scire, and our own nuclear submarine. They have different capabilities and different limitations, so to work that problem was great training for us. We do a lot of ASW training in simulators, but to really excel at ASW, sailors need to train in the actual ocean environment," said Driscoll.
Participating countries included Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States. Some of the participating units included the Canadian ship HMCS Fredericton (FFG 337), Brazilian ship BNS Liberale (F43), Italian submarine ITS Scire (S527), and Royal Netherlands ships HNLMS Tromp (F803) and HNLMS Van Speijk (F828).
The exercise also marked the first ever inclusion of the Standing NATO Mine Counter Measures Group 1, which includes the Danish ocean patrol vessel HDMS Thetis (F357), the Belgian coastal minehunter BNS Lobelia (M 921), the Royal Netherlands minehunter HNLMS Urk (M861), the Estonian minehunter ENS Sakala (M314), the British minesweeper HMS Quorn, and the Royal Norwegian minesweeper KNM Rauma (M352).
"It was a great opportunity to work communications and other interoperability issues with HDMS Thetis and other coalition partners during a training environment. Exercises like this will make real world operations easier to execute," said Cmdr. James Midkiff, commanding officer of USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79).
After successful completion of JTFEX, the Strike Group will now begin Fleet Synthetic Training – Joint, the final element of certification for global deployment.
The HST CSG is made up of the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), with its embarked air wing, Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 3, and embarked Destroyer Squadron 26 staff, guided missile cruisers USS San Jacinto (CG 56) and USS Hue city (CG 66); guided missile destroyers USS Carney (DDG 64), USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79) and USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81).
CVW-3 consists of Strike Fighter Squadrons VFA-32, VFA-37, VFA-105 and VMFA-312; Tactical Electronics Warfare Squadron VAQ-130; Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron VAW-126; and Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron HS-7.
Coast Guard Cutter Tahoma back home after 60-day patrol in Caribbean
By Charles McMahon, Foster's Daily Democrat
The Coast Guard Cutter Tahoma guards the Hudson River Sept. 17 as part of port security duties after [the] Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Centers in New York. (Photo by PA2 Tom Sperduto)
KITTERY, Maine — The crew on board Coast Guard Cutter Tahoma (WMEC-908) arrived home Tuesday following a 60-day patrol of the Caribbean.
The crew logged hundreds of hours in the cutter's two small boats conducting cooperative law enforcement and boat operations with the Haitian coast guard and several other U.S. Coast Guard assets.
Working with various Coast Guard air stations, the Tahoma participated in hundreds of helicopter operations involving day and night take-offs and landings, refueling, and medical evacuation evolutions with the HH-60 Jayhawk and HH-65 Dolphin aircraft.
The 270-foot cutter is home ported in Kittery, Maine, and is under way with primary missions including maritime law enforcement, illegal immigrant operations and drug interdiction.
You can read the complete story at fosters.com, a service of the Foster's Daily Democrat newspaper, http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090930/GJNEWS_01/709309958/-1/FOSNEWS
The official USCG website for the Tahoma is located at http://www.uscg.mil/lantarea/cgcTahoma/
The Coast Guard Cutter Tahoma guards the Hudson River Sept. 17 as part of port security duties after [the] Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Centers in New York. (Photo by PA2 Tom Sperduto)KITTERY, Maine — The crew on board Coast Guard Cutter Tahoma (WMEC-908) arrived home Tuesday following a 60-day patrol of the Caribbean.
The crew logged hundreds of hours in the cutter's two small boats conducting cooperative law enforcement and boat operations with the Haitian coast guard and several other U.S. Coast Guard assets.
Working with various Coast Guard air stations, the Tahoma participated in hundreds of helicopter operations involving day and night take-offs and landings, refueling, and medical evacuation evolutions with the HH-60 Jayhawk and HH-65 Dolphin aircraft.
The 270-foot cutter is home ported in Kittery, Maine, and is under way with primary missions including maritime law enforcement, illegal immigrant operations and drug interdiction.
You can read the complete story at fosters.com, a service of the Foster's Daily Democrat newspaper, http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090930/GJNEWS_01/709309958/-1/FOSNEWS
The official USCG website for the Tahoma is located at http://www.uscg.mil/lantarea/cgcTahoma/
USS Blue Ridge Visiting Sydney Australia
Sailors man the rails as amphibious command ship USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19) arrives pierside in Sydney Australia. During the 7th Fleet flagship's scheduled port visit, Sailors will participate in community service projects and explore the sights of the city. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Ben Farone/Released)
USS Denver (LPD 9) prepares for deployment
The USS Denver (LPD 9) based in Saesbo prepares for deployment. For a video report click here http://www.navy.mil/swf/mmu/mmplyr.asp?id=13212 .
First Operational Growler Squadron 'Safe for Flight'
NAVAL AIR STATION WHIDBEY ISLAND, Wash. (NNS) -- Electronic Attack (VAQ) 132 received the official notification in a Sept. 22 Navy message from Capt. Tom Slais, Commander Electronic Attack Wing, U.S. Pacific Fleet, that the squadron was certified "safe for flight operations in the EA-18G."
"Your hard work and dedication is exemplary, and I am confident you will continue to display the same pride and professionalism as you execute safe operations and maintain your aircraft," said Slais.
The first operational Growler squadron to attain "safe for flight" status since the first EA-18G arrived Naval Air Station Whidbey Island in June 2008 recently returned from a successful carrier qualification detachment on board USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) with a 100 percent qualification rate.
Operating out of Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., each pilot in the Fleet's first EA-18G "Growler" squadron completed a series of day and night arrested landings to become officially qualified to fly the newest fleet aircraft aboard Navy aircraft carriers.
"Carrier Qualification is a huge milestone in VAQ-132's transition to the Growler," said Bunnay, who was happy with the results of the detachment. "Squadrons build their reputations operating around the carrier, and I feel like we conducted ourselves with a high level of professionalism."
Since February of this year, VAQ-132 has been in the process of transitioning to the EA-18G under the guidance of VAQ-129, the Fleet Replacement Squadron responsible for training transition aircrew.
Along with the Scorpion aircrew, the maintenance personnel in VAQ-132 have been working non-stop to complete their requirements for the squadron's "safe for flight" qualification, which will allow them to operate airplanes autonomously.
Recently the maintenance department underwent a series of rigorous inspections conducted by Electronic Attack Wing, U.S. Pacific Fleet and performed above and beyond expectations.
"Your hard work and dedication is exemplary, and I am confident you will continue to display the same pride and professionalism as you execute safe operations and maintain your aircraft," said Slais.
The first operational Growler squadron to attain "safe for flight" status since the first EA-18G arrived Naval Air Station Whidbey Island in June 2008 recently returned from a successful carrier qualification detachment on board USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) with a 100 percent qualification rate.
Operating out of Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., each pilot in the Fleet's first EA-18G "Growler" squadron completed a series of day and night arrested landings to become officially qualified to fly the newest fleet aircraft aboard Navy aircraft carriers.
"Carrier Qualification is a huge milestone in VAQ-132's transition to the Growler," said Bunnay, who was happy with the results of the detachment. "Squadrons build their reputations operating around the carrier, and I feel like we conducted ourselves with a high level of professionalism."
Since February of this year, VAQ-132 has been in the process of transitioning to the EA-18G under the guidance of VAQ-129, the Fleet Replacement Squadron responsible for training transition aircrew.
Along with the Scorpion aircrew, the maintenance personnel in VAQ-132 have been working non-stop to complete their requirements for the squadron's "safe for flight" qualification, which will allow them to operate airplanes autonomously.
Recently the maintenance department underwent a series of rigorous inspections conducted by Electronic Attack Wing, U.S. Pacific Fleet and performed above and beyond expectations.
McChord Airmen head for 'the ice' as Operation Deep Freeze season kicks off
by Staff Sgt. Eric Burks, 62nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs
MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE, Wash. (AFNS) -- Thirty-seven McChord Air Force Base Airmen left Sept. 24 in a C-17 Globemaster III loaded with more than 90,000 pounds of cargo destined for Antarctica to begin another season of Operation Deep Freeze.
The 2009-2010 season of Operation Deep Freeze, the Defense Department's support of the U.S. Antarctic Program and the National Science Foundation, officially kicks off Sept. 26 and will be one of the most robust to date, as more than 60 missions are projected.
"The number of C-17 missions to Antarctica will increase this season by approximately 25 percent as compared to last season when work on the Pegasus Ice Runway necessitated a brief mission pause," said Lt. Col. Walt Clark, the lead Operation Deep Freeze planner at 13th Air Force from Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii.
The missions will build upon August's successful winter fly-in, and a historic 2008-2009 season that included the first-ever night-vision goggle landing on the Antarctic continent and groundbreaking high-altitude airdrops to remote areas such as the Antarctic Gamburtsev Mountain Province.
This season also marks the 10th year C-17s have supported the mission. The first McChord AFB C-17 touched down on the ice runway outside McMurdo Station, Antarctica, Oct. 15, 1999. In previous missions from McChord AFB , Antarctic flights were completed in the C-141 Starlifter, which had supported Deep Freeze operations since 1966.
"The C-17 has revolutionized how we do business down there," said Lt. Col. Robert Wellington, the 62nd Operations Group deputy commander and 304th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron commander, working for Joint Task Force Support Forces Antarctica. "We can better satisfy user requirements. We're leaner, more efficient and use fewer resources.
"But we couldn't do that without the great teamwork of the 446th and 62nd airlift wings and their tenant units," said Colonel Wellington, an Operation Deep Freeze veteran who has flown multiple missions during previous seasons.
As the new 304th EAS commander, the colonel aims to continue the McChord AFB tradition of support to the program, both on and off "the ice."
"Because we have such great Airmen involved, operations really take care of themselves. The biggest challenge will be continuing the strong relationships my predecessor established, both within the program and in the community," Colonel Wellington said.
The first few flights into McMurdo Station, Antarctica, will carry support personnel, after those initial flights they will unload supplies required for McMurdo's scientific research mission, said Lt. Col. J.W. Smith, the 313th Airlift Squadron assistant operations officer and 304th EAS directing officer.
"We're ramping up for the beginning of the Antarctic exploration season," Colonel Smith said. "We'll be bringing McMurdo out of winter hibernation."
Deep Freeze is unlike any other U.S. military operation -- it's possibly the military's most difficult peacetime mission due to the harsh Antarctic environment, according to 13th Air Force officials. The U.S. military is uniquely equipped and trained to operate in such an austere environment and has therefore provided support to the U.S. Antarctic Program since 1955.
Airlift for Operation Deep Freeze involves active-duty and Reserve C-17 support from McChord AFB and New York Air National Guard LC-130 Hercules aircraft from Stratton Air National Guard Base, Scotia, N.Y.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
USS Freedom Conducts Flight Deck Certification
The littoral combat ship USS Freedom (LCS 1) conducts flight deck certification with an MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter assigned to the Sea Knights of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 22. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Nathan Laird/Released)
Truman CSG Completes JTFEX
The Truman Carrier Strike Group completes a joint task force exercise with nine nations. Video storey at http://www.navy.mil/swf/mmu/mmplyr.asp?id=13203
Coast Guard sending a C-130 plane to American Samoa
By Associated Press
The U.S. Coast Guard planned to send a C-130 plane to American Samoa to deliver aid and assess damage after a powerful earthquake and tsunami hit the U.S. territory, officials said Tuesday
The plane was due to leave Hawaii in the evening, in time to arrive at first light in Pago Pago, the capital, on Wednesday.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency was also preparing to send a response team.
Read the rest of the story at
http://www.starbulletin.com/news/breaking/62741682.html
Monday, September 28, 2009
Milcom Blog Logs - Sep 23-27 2009 - Mid Atlantic
Our old friend and MMP reporter Ron checks in again with some more great HF blog logs from his Mid Atlantic listening post. Thanks Ron for sharing. All times are UTC and frequencies in kHz.
23 Sep
16540.0 Calypso (vessel-O/M accented EE): 2030 USB calling Gypsy Dragon (vessel)- Calypso idents sefl as being in the Atlantic Ocean.(RP-MD)
08345.0 RJP98 (Russian Navy): 2215 CW w/readability checks.(RP-MD)
08218.0 O/M (Spanish): 2335 USB w/O/M (Spanish). Poss maritime link.(RP-MD)
08279.0 O/M (Spanish): 2349 USB w/O/M (Spanish). (RP-MD)
24 Sep
08345.0 RGMB (Russian Navy): 0001 CW sending 5-digit group msgs to RJH45, RJE73 & RJH74.(RP-MD)
07530.0 CamsLant Chesapeake: 1307 radio checks w/CGAS Savannah, GA.(RP-MD)
10194.0 FC4FEM (Communications Manager, FEMA Region 4, Thomasville GA): 1430 USB/ALE calling SC4FEM (South Carolina State EOC, Columbia SC); TN4FEM (Tennessee State EOC, Nashville TN) & KY4FEM (Kentucky State EOC, Frankfort KY). (RP-MD)
08045.6 XSS (UK DHFCS, Forest Moor UK): 1815 USB/ALE sounding.(RP-MD)
09075.0 1EW! (Venezuelan Naval Base "Amario"): 2305 LSB/ALE w/2TB9 (Venezuelan Navy LSM "Goijaira" T-63) exchanging DTM admin msgs. (RP-MD)
25 Sep
08345.0 RFH77 (Russian Navy): 0036 CW w/msg " QYT4 QSX 9 28T/IT 44 K." (Repeated twice).(RP-MD)
08344.0 RMUW (Rusasian Navy): 0230 CW w/msg "543 34 25 T615 543" for RCV (Russian Navy) & RIW (Russian Navy HQ Moscow) (RP-MD)
08280.0 1Z8C (Venezuelan Navy--poss Oceanographic Survey Ship "Punta Brava" BO-11): 0351 USB/ALE calling 1PZ2 (Venezuelan Navy), (RP-MD)
10202.0 010CDCNHQ (HQs, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta GA): 1315 USB/ALE sounding. (RP-MD)
08345.0 RJQ84 (Russian Navy): 2115 CW (msg garbled). RFH77 also w/readability checks w/RIW. (RP-MD)
26 Sep
08050.0 DKB (US JSOC, Fort Bragg NC): 1530 USB/ALE sounding. (RP-MD)
08231.0 O/M (Spanish): 2340 USB w/O/M (Spanish).(RP-MD)
27 Sep
08345.0 RMGB (Russian Navy) & RMUW (Russian Navy): 0001 CW calling RIW ( Russian Navy HQ Moscow) for readability. (RP-MD)-both stations L/C at my QTH
08345.0 RMGB (Russian Navy): 0009 CW w/msg for RIW & RCV : 11111 647T 452T1 343T8 72771 3T622 4892T 756T6 64354 83T T8 61156 24168 36619 73722 6 T T 92 11338 64933 33T7T 56387 42629 63379 94533 42865 26T33 56418 81668 T6T31 RMGBRPT T6T31 97635 15799 98671 12269 85894 26267 471T2 9718 T 35274 76695 64237 56649 68T37 792T9 53123 94T54 58657 65642 T949çE 58134 98649 T1291 72DE77 8T112 52459 86548 I5823 83984 96551 31462 2243 73185 83132 15983 36645 27TI3=+ RMGBK. (RP-MD)
08345.0 RMUW (Russian Navy): 0016 CW w/msg RCVDERMUWRMUWQEE ?QTCK (garble here) 7TT1 99354 7T TSET3 41/97 / 6T3 1T2ç5 4T156 EH4T T T 76266 22IMT T TT 228 2T3T1 88T T T 227IIII 2T3T1 88T T T 27T13NU+RMUWK --then msg DE RMGBK RMGB 175 16 26 T4TT 175=SML FOR RJH45 RJE73= 27T7K RMGBRPT 27T T1 99356 7 T T47 41/97 1T175 4118T 51T2T 76226 8/// / 22232 T T21T 2T2T2 27T12=+ RMGBK RMGB K QRUK E---xmitter same strength & sound as RMGB. (RP-MD)
08050.0 Grecia (poss Mexican Military): 0200 USB/ALE calling PASTOR (poss Mexican Military). (RP-MD)
Ron, Utility Monitoring from Maryland, USA
Icom R75 45-ft EF-SWL Decoder- Multipsk V4.10
23 Sep
16540.0 Calypso (vessel-O/M accented EE): 2030 USB calling Gypsy Dragon (vessel)- Calypso idents sefl as being in the Atlantic Ocean.(RP-MD)
08345.0 RJP98 (Russian Navy): 2215 CW w/readability checks.(RP-MD)
08218.0 O/M (Spanish): 2335 USB w/O/M (Spanish). Poss maritime link.(RP-MD)
08279.0 O/M (Spanish): 2349 USB w/O/M (Spanish). (RP-MD)
24 Sep
08345.0 RGMB (Russian Navy): 0001 CW sending 5-digit group msgs to RJH45, RJE73 & RJH74.(RP-MD)
07530.0 CamsLant Chesapeake: 1307 radio checks w/CGAS Savannah, GA.(RP-MD)
10194.0 FC4FEM (Communications Manager, FEMA Region 4, Thomasville GA): 1430 USB/ALE calling SC4FEM (South Carolina State EOC, Columbia SC); TN4FEM (Tennessee State EOC, Nashville TN) & KY4FEM (Kentucky State EOC, Frankfort KY). (RP-MD)
08045.6 XSS (UK DHFCS, Forest Moor UK): 1815 USB/ALE sounding.(RP-MD)
09075.0 1EW! (Venezuelan Naval Base "Amario"): 2305 LSB/ALE w/2TB9 (Venezuelan Navy LSM "Goijaira" T-63) exchanging DTM admin msgs. (RP-MD)
25 Sep
08345.0 RFH77 (Russian Navy): 0036 CW w/msg " QYT4 QSX 9 28T/IT 44 K." (Repeated twice).(RP-MD)
08344.0 RMUW (Rusasian Navy): 0230 CW w/msg "543 34 25 T615 543" for RCV (Russian Navy) & RIW (Russian Navy HQ Moscow) (RP-MD)
08280.0 1Z8C (Venezuelan Navy--poss Oceanographic Survey Ship "Punta Brava" BO-11): 0351 USB/ALE calling 1PZ2 (Venezuelan Navy), (RP-MD)
10202.0 010CDCNHQ (HQs, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta GA): 1315 USB/ALE sounding. (RP-MD)
08345.0 RJQ84 (Russian Navy): 2115 CW (msg garbled). RFH77 also w/readability checks w/RIW. (RP-MD)
26 Sep
08050.0 DKB (US JSOC, Fort Bragg NC): 1530 USB/ALE sounding. (RP-MD)
08231.0 O/M (Spanish): 2340 USB w/O/M (Spanish).(RP-MD)
27 Sep
08345.0 RMGB (Russian Navy) & RMUW (Russian Navy): 0001 CW calling RIW ( Russian Navy HQ Moscow) for readability. (RP-MD)-both stations L/C at my QTH
08345.0 RMGB (Russian Navy): 0009 CW w/msg for RIW & RCV : 11111 647T 452T1 343T8 72771 3T622 4892T 756T6 64354 83T T8 61156 24168 36619 73722 6 T T 92 11338 64933 33T7T 56387 42629 63379 94533 42865 26T33 56418 81668 T6T31 RMGBRPT T6T31 97635 15799 98671 12269 85894 26267 471T2 9718 T 35274 76695 64237 56649 68T37 792T9 53123 94T54 58657 65642 T949çE 58134 98649 T1291 72DE77 8T112 52459 86548 I5823 83984 96551 31462 2243 73185 83132 15983 36645 27TI3=+ RMGBK. (RP-MD)
08345.0 RMUW (Russian Navy): 0016 CW w/msg RCVDERMUWRMUWQEE ?QTCK (garble here) 7TT1 99354 7T TSET3 41/97 / 6T3 1T2ç5 4T156 EH4T T T 76266 22IMT T TT 228 2T3T1 88T T T 227IIII 2T3T1 88T T T 27T13NU+RMUWK --then msg DE RMGBK RMGB 175 16 26 T4TT 175=SML FOR RJH45 RJE73= 27T7K RMGBRPT 27T T1 99356 7 T T47 41/97 1T175 4118T 51T2T 76226 8/// / 22232 T T21T 2T2T2 27T12=+ RMGBK RMGB K QRUK E---xmitter same strength & sound as RMGB. (RP-MD)
08050.0 Grecia (poss Mexican Military): 0200 USB/ALE calling PASTOR (poss Mexican Military). (RP-MD)
Ron, Utility Monitoring from Maryland, USA
Icom R75 45-ft EF-SWL Decoder- Multipsk V4.10
Nightwatch: A Monitors Look Back on Its History
Here is an interesting look back on the Nightwatch aircraft from a monitoring point of few. It was originally published by the dean of EAM monitors, Jeff Haverlah in Texas. It is reproduced here by permission of the author. I am also working on something special on EAM, "Emergency Action Messages." You will have to stay tuned to this blog to learn more about when and where that material will appear.
NIGHTWATCH 01
I am not sure that I should be publishing this, but it is certainly interesting. The following details radio traffic used by the Alternate Joint Communication Center (AJCC) and the National Military Command Center (NMCC) at Raven Rock, Pennsylvania. I don't completely understand it, so don't ask.
On, or no later than, Monday 21 March 1994 (and heard active with ANDREWS VIP on utc 19 March 1994) the callsign "NIGHTWATCH 01" was utilized as the static callsign for the Net Control Station of the High Frequency radio net now known as the "NIGHTWATCH net" [prior to this date the NCS was identified as a daily changing tactical callword of between 9 and 7 characters in length, a practice that had been in effect for many years].
The identity of the HF NCS remained "NIGHTWATCH 01" from at least March 1994 (with one known exception) up to the end of February or the first day of March 1999. At 0000z (or slightly later) 23 January 1999 the station known as NIGHTWATCH 01 was aliased to a daily changing tactical callword, and utilized a daily changing callsign over the next three days (UTC) [RAILROAD; JAYWALK; HAILSTORM]. On 26 January 1999 the NCS reverted to the static callsign NIGHTWATCH 01 [with indications that certain players in his net were expecting the use of RAINCOAT and GAS HOUSE on the 26th and 27th of January]. Possibly on Saturday 27 February 1999 [HAPPY DAY], but in any case no later than Monday 01 March 1999 the station known as "NIGHTWATCH 01" again was aliased to a daily changing tactical callword and has remained aliased since that date. In addition all other static identities, with the exception of WAR 46, have been aliased to daily changing tactical callsigns as well.
These identities include the front end callsigns of the UFAF's E-4Bs (GORDO ## to daily changing 5-character callsigns), WALDORF, Ground Entry Points (GEP's), Air Force alert pad locations, etc. [Or at least their intention to remain aliased is noticable even though there are many times in which there are exceptions when the locations are identified by their command static names]. The following was complied over a period of time beginning in late 1994 and does not reflect the change to daily changing tactical callsigns on the part of NIGHTWATCH 01 and some of the other static callsigned players.
However, as of now even though NIGHTWATCH 01 is aliased to a callword the net activity still fits the "template" of pre March 1999 activity with all players still usually recognizable [except for NIGHTWATCH 02/03/04; it is suspected that 02 would still be recognizable due to certain patterns of behavior unique to him, but it's only speculation]. But as always, the net still appears to be undergoing a steady evolution of unknown resolution.
Net participants: Net control station Usually, NIGHTWATCH 01. When NIGHTWATCH 01 is in his/her 'monitor only' period, it appears that another net participant gets partial ncs duties, but not always. Since October 1998 (+/-) it is very noticable that there is almost always no accomplished net control station in the absence of NIGHTWATCH 01. Daily changing tactical callsigned stations WAR46 WAR 46 MOBILE WGY### (FEMA activity implied), sometimes 'aliased' to a callsign. 'Callsign' ## - extremely rare 'GORDO' ## - *extremely* rare NIGHTWATCH 02 through 04. NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA NIGHTWATCH 04 CHARLIE NIGHTWATCH - Probably a sign of lax practices on the net, where they start dropping the suffix.
AWACS using their "backend" identities (DARKSTAR NOVEMBER etc) (Possibly TROUT 99 once, and maybe not - active with a player.) Callsign information NIGHTWATCH ## Heard: NIGHTWATCH 01 - most common callsign NIGHTWATCH 02 NIGHTWATCH 03 NIGHTWATCH 04 NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA NIGHTWATCH 04 CHARLIE NIGHTWATCH 01: Callsign was apparently activated 21 Mar 94 (or, at least very near that date) as the NCS for it's nets. Prior to 21 Mar 94, the NCS was usually a 9-character callsigned station. Seems to be active 24 hours a day (even when he's not active.
However, from the latter half of 1998 NIGHTWATCH 01 would be noticably out of the net for extended periods during major Presidential trips out of the country. Prior to this time the "decapitation" seemed to be for much shorter timeperiods, if at all, during Presidential foreign trips). Often he is apparently parked on a ramp somewhere, but active. (When on the ground at DYESS and BARKSDALE his signal is usually unheard here - his signal will "skip" over my location) Can be reached at various DSN numbers: In the states, most common DSN is the 939 prefix. During a phonepatch in Dec 96, it was alluded that the GHFS station [MACDILL, now closed] had a total of 5 DSN numbers assigned to NIGHTWATCH 01. Twice during active net activity in late 1994, NIGHTWATCH 01 was described by a player as the "kneecap" [NEACP].
During Oct/Nov 1995 net activity (and later), he was described as "nay-ok" [NAOC] which would reflect the 1994 "name" change from NEACP to NAOC. NIGHTWATCH 01 apparently uses other callsigns: CHALICE BRAVO (AWACS) placed patch (1994) via GHFS to CASELOAD. When patch was activated, the called party id'ed himself as NIGHTWATCH 01. CHALICE BRAVO refused to talk to this station (despite urging of GHFS opr and NIGHTWATCH 01 opr) until NIGHTWATCH 01 opr id'd himself as CASELOAD. Comms can be conducted by two or more operators (male and/or female), sometimes at the same time. And sometimes during extended sentences and challanges on the nets, part of the comm can be by two different operators sometimes literally in the same sentence. In 1994, NIGHTWATCH 01 would attempt phonepatch service for a player in the net (a call to the DSN 339 prefix associated with StratComm Wing ONE at TINKER); and he attempted to place another phonepatch on another day for an ACME ## (who had called MAINSAIL, and raised WARLORD instead, acting as sort of a go-fer for NW01) on the GHFS to another DSN 339 number (unsuccessful). [While editing this in 1999 it suddenly struck me that ACME ## was a TACAMO calling a location at StratComm Wing 1]. 1999: These phonepatch attempts are very rare but have been heard in the years since 1994.
Since 1998 (since shortly after 25 September 1998) NIGHTWATCH 01 has acted as apparent designated contact party between certain players in the daily nets and WALDORF. The players (obvious E-6Bs) will raise NIGHTWATCH 01 to request that NIGHTWATCH 01 contact WALDORF to set up comms via numbered RF channels/configurations and by particular Ground Entry Points: GEP points heard (here) in the nets since 1998: OFFUTT LAMAR NOBLE (OK) HILLSBORO ALBUQUERQUE BARKSDALE SIGNAL MOUNTAIN (TN) WILLIAMS ("AFB") JASPER STRAWBERRY PEAK Plus: WRIGHT PAT GREEN HILL ELLSIVILLE (FL) (And maybe others) If the callsigns cannot reach NIGHTWATCH 01 via the HF net frequencies then they have been known to contact NIGHTWATCH 01 via GHFS phonepatch to coordinate this activity. Prior to shortly after 25 Sept 1998 the callsigns would contact WALDORF directly via GHFS phonepatch through a commercial toll-free telephone number. As of early Oct 1998 or so it is now very rare (but no unheard of) for the callsigns to place these requests directly, particularly if NIGHTWATCH 01 is in a monitor only mode or is out of contact of the net.. NIGHTWATCH 02: Tentative. NIGHTWATCH 02 seems to become very active during major comm exercises. NIGHTWATCH 02 apparently does not assume a 'lead' role during it's activity. It seems to 'defer' to NIGHTWATCH 01. It's role does not appear to be passive, but it is much less active than NIGHTWATCH 01.
Two major examples of when NIGHTWATCH 02 played much more than a passive role: 22/23 (UTC) Mar 95: A massive net participating in a 12 hour exercise (1800z+/- to 0600z+/-), with NIGHTWATCH 01 and NIGHTWATCH 02 very active (by local evening they were using 5700.0 as a 'backchannel' while the net was active elsewhere.)
1. NIGHTWATCH 02 would pass in-the-blind "three-six- nine messages" to the net: at 2008z 22 Mar 95, the 369 message was preceeded with a call to NORMANDY. (It may have been a code word in the manner of SKYMASTER - there was no NORMANDY heard in the net at any time that day.) Additional information: There is now (post 1997) heavy use of the callword SKYMASTER when they preface their AKAC 3-6-9 messages during these exercises (late October and March are two heavy exercise periods). SKYMASTER appears to be a general call to any airborne command post. Although only recently noted during these exercises the callword was said to have been heard in the late 80s on certain UHF circuits.
2. The NIGHTWATCH 02 operator was definitely *not* USN. At 1957z, PROLOGUE calls NIGHTWATCH 02 ("Two"), then calls CLAYBIRD (very high up in that net's pecking order), and asks CLAYBIRD to get the coordinates for NIGHTWATCH 02's "Playground". CLAYBIRD did so, and NIGHTWATCH 02 responded with a "request for spelling of callsign PLAYGROUND." This went round and round for 30 seconds, so CLAYBIRD (with a noticable "smile" in his voice) said that they want *YOUR* Playground. With a "roger, roger," NIGHTWATCH 02 advised that he now understood, and requested (and used) ANDVT comms. NIGHTWATCH 02, of all the NIGHTWATCHs (other than 01) is the most active of all, when he is active on days other than exercise days. Yet, this activity is still rare. NIGHTWATCH 02 has certain characteristics/practices that are unique to him alone of all the net players in his dealings with NIGHTWATCH 01.
NIGHTWATCH 03-04: *Very rare*. Not heard by me in *any* active exercise; only heard on apparently random days. (During one week NIGHTWATCH 04 (female opr) was caught on a couple of days calling WGY 918 (Denver - and I got the strangest feeling from her station's sound that she was over the Western U.S. - a propagation thing.)
NIGHTWATCH 04 'alphacharacter'
On 17 Aug 95, NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA periodically called NIGHTWATCH 04 CHARLIE (aka NIGHTWATCH 04 'see'). This kind of suffixed call as it applies to the NIGHTWATCH 0# is new to me and to others. These calls were active on a day during which NIGHTWATCH 01 maintained a large active net on that day's HF net frequency and NIGHTWATCH 02, 03, and 04 were all active on 11243.0. It was during these comms that the NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA and CHARLIE comms were heard. Daily Tactical Callsigns. Mostly consist of eight character callsigns, at least since Mar 94. Now not true as of fall of 95. There are now lots of 7 and 9 character calls active, all seemingly USN assets (TACAMOs probably.) [Written prior to 01 October 1998. but character count info still valid as of 1998]. There are also 9-character and 7-character callsigns as well. *Very* rarely there are 6-character callsigns. Significance of the 6-character call? Very rarely there are 5-character callsigns: BANKS, SUSAN, EVANS, NOTED, etc. (Rhetorical question: are the 5-character callsigns, which are almost always persons' names, maybe ground stations??
The TACAMOs have been heard discussing 5 character callsigns on ocassion. EVANS is definitely associated with StratComm Wing ONE, and is apparently 'static.' [EVANS is often referenced by the players when they are discussing their WHISKEY BRAVO comms in phonepatches with BOOMTOWN]. NOTED is another 5-character callsign that appears often in TACAMO oriented conversations; it is not clear from context if NOTED is just another airborne player or if he is something else. Another rhetorical question: are the MCC's (Mobile "National" Command Centers) still active, and do/did they ever show up in the nets aliased to callwords, either pre or post 01 Jun 92? And, there are still very rare occasions where there are 10 to 12-character callsigns (but nothing larger.) SILVERDOLLAR; GOLD DIGGER. Prior to Mar 94, RESETTLEMENT. These were usually heard during apparent exercises. SILVER DOLLAR was heard on a day when the players in the nets were conducting the once common monthly "Exercise Inject" activity on the GHFS. Information about the callsigns: (1994-1998): One of the participants is a daily tactical callsign that initiates the EAMs into the nets. Separate from NIGHTWATCH 01 who also will bcst EAMs.
Apparently, the same station each day with a different callsign (presumed 'glass but not always). In many cases the operators are recognizable day to day. (Many have distinctive comm "habbits"/ mannerisms or distinctive regional accents). The operator is almost always male. Female operator only heard twice in during 1994/95. No longer the case - female operators are not nearly as common as male operators but are no longer rarely heard. The diction of the operators is very distinctive. The background noise level is quite high. Voices reading alphanumeric character strings. Voices calling out trigraph callsigns (sounds USN) Not noticed as much in 1997+. Sometimes rarely, 'warble tones' heard in background (very rare) Sometime this station maybe comes up on freq with a 'growl' of a transmitter tuneup device. Mostly he justs pops up.
On 20 Feb 96, VALHALLA popped up for 10 seconds with keyed transmitter that sounded just like the sounds a number station makes both pre and post traffic; then he was into his EAM. Seems to be about the same signal strength each day at my location (fair levels only; changed in 1998). Most of the callsigns in the nets are USN assets (TACAMOs). Distinctive USN comm chatter. Distinctive USN rank/rating chatter. They spend lots of time on the GHFS calling TINKER DSN 339 numbers - StratComm Wing 1. Prior to Oct 95 (or maybe earlier): Most common number: 339 3944, always id'd by a callword, sometimes remaining static over two days, but usually changing on a daily basis. If they called VQ4 OPCON, they placed phonepatches to DSN 326 numbers - PAX RIVER. Since the Spring of 1996, the DSN prefix is now 342. 1998: This number is now very rarely heard. From Oct 95 (Nov 95, for sure), *all* VQ4 OPCON (aka OPCON) go to a single DSN 339 number, and the use of the callwords has mostly dissappeared, with the exception of BOOMTOWN, which is a static call, and has it's own "position" within viewing and shouting distance (apparently) of the VQ4 OPCON guys. Mentions of VQ3 (OPCON) were/are much rarer [1998 and earlier]. They have their own DSN 339 number. Maybe starting in late 1996 (or maybe early 1997) many of these calls were id'd as COMMAND CENTER. As of late 1998 they may be back to using callwords for their id's instead of in-the-clear identifications.
At an airshow in mid 1995, members of a TACAMO crew confirmed that they are heavy participants with NIGHTWATCH 01 and WAR46 (although they did not directly confirm or discuss participation in the nets, nor would they discuss the nature of the nets and their participants - but they did confirm that they are often heard on HF with their "restorals" - the xmsn of their "traffic" (the EAMs)). Just guessing, but I suspect that on most days (those days when it is not just NIGHTWATCH 01 and one or two callsigns (TACAMOs)), the nets consist mostly of all TACAMOs, plus NIGHTWATCH 01 and one other probable non-TACAMO callsigned aircraft - maybe USAF, plus the EAM initiator. Just guessing, though. [This was before 25 Sep 1998. After this date there were no EC135Cs active in these nets]. And, just maybe one of these USN 'assets' is not airborne at all, particularly during exercises. The USN has been an active player in these nets since maybe June 1992 (August 1992 for sure.) On 19 Aug 92 (the first day that I noticed the *heavy* USN lingo on these nets) the ncs OUTSPOKEN (9-characters) directed CROWNSAW to pass OUTSPOKEN's traffic (GVNMTM..) to SIERRA ONE WHISKEY.
A quick spin through the memories found CROWNSAW on 11255.0 (location of a *very* active USN net), except CROWNSAW was now B1V calling S1W, trying to pass his traffic. A late 1996 issue of Aviation Week and Space Technology indicated that the TACAMO's have been active with comms for the bombers and missile silos since 1990. Also alluded to in a 12 Jun 95 article on the TACAMO "Looking Glass" upgrade in Aviation Week and Space Technology. (late 1998 and later): The EAM broadcaster: One of three stations on "normal" days: Most common: a station using a daily changing callword. Almost always at good or better signal levels here. Common: NIGHTWATCH 01 (1999: aliased to callword). Varies in signal strength from day to day and hour to hour. Not rare: another station aliased to a daily tactical callword, and heard on certain "USN" HF frequencies as well. Signal strength varies, but usually at no better than fair levels here. Since 1998 some of these stations (including NIGHTWATCH 01) will pop up on a frequency approximately 500hz "high" and noticable move down in frequency to zero beat the proper frequency - this was explained by one NIGHTWATCH 01 operator to a questioning callsign operator as being the result a transmitter being just turned on and quickly "warming up" (!). [From comm chatter, there was apparently a major equipment upgrade performed in 1997 or 1998]. 'Daily Tactical callsign' stations with numeric suffixes: On 22 Aug 95, SEAOTTER was a very active player in that night's NIGHTWATCH net on 6730.0. At 0415z+, a station id'ing as SEAOTTER TWO periodically calls SEAOTTER THREE, with no response. This kind of suffixed 'daily tactical callsign' is very new to me in reference to these nets (or anywhere else, for that matter.) On 24 Aug 95, GUIDEPOST (female opr, and the EAM initiator to the Net), id'd herself later as GUIDEPOST 01, working GUIDEPOST 02 (male opr.) Approx 30 min. later, female opr, now iding as GUIDEPOST 02, worked the male opr, iding as GUIDEPOST 01, and checked GUIDEPOST 01 out of the net with the 'challange' process. ????? On 07 Nov 95, FACECARD 02 seemed to replace FACECARD 01 in the net, and FACECARD 02 seemed to become FACECARD. The above suggests that during these periods of time, the callsign is to remain static, but the a/c is replaced. A hand-off. [No instance of this was heard in 1998]. TACAMO PAC and TACAMO CENT mentioned in the NIGHTWATCH net of 31 Dec 96 on 9016.0; probably aliased to callwords (at the time, maybe DIGNIFIED and DOORKNOB).
WAR46 FORT RICHIE, Md. (Site "R" - Raven Rock, PA..)
Seems to check in near top of hour and around H+40 for signal checks with NIGHTWATCH 01 only. (He can check in at any time, though; but, as a general rule the H+40/45 time frame seems to hold on many days.) [This was true at the time but does not seem to be the case in 1998]. He (female oprs are *very* rare here: 06 Oct 95 for instance) [still true as of 1998+] has vary rarely worked callsign stations though in the past, mostly to advise that NIGHTWATCH 01 is 'monitor-only.' Does not engage in chatter, otherwise - seemingly ignoring requests for info from callsigned stations. In 1998 NIGHTWATCH 01 would sometimes use WAR 46 to contact stations that NIGHTWATCH 01 was having problems hearing. Prior to 21 Mar 94, WAR46 would often work the callword statons active in the net, presumably the ncs (who seemed to be mostly 9-character calls prior to 21 Mar 94, which may or may not suggest that the 9-character callsign was the JCS's NEACP). Seems to constantly monitor the nets. Very powerful signal at my location (usually much stronger than the players in the net at my location, including NIGHTWATCH 01.) He's powerful to me even on days that NW01 cannot hear WAR46's calls to NW01. (But not always. Since 1997 there have been days when he is barely heard here; maybe an effect of changing propagation with the increase in solar activity). NIGHTWATCH 01 will rarely use WAR46 to place phonepatches.
Recent DSN number was described as "seven figures", and not by it's actual number (which was at OFFUTT.) WAR46 was also caught once (in late 1994) placing a phonepatch to a DSN 339 number for a non-NIGHWATCH player in the net. NIGHTWATCH 01 was also caught once in 1994 attempting this as well for a player. In the past year or so [1998] NIGHTWATCH 01 will often raise WAR 46 for quick hi 'n bye connectivity checks with certain DSN numbers usually associated with NIGHTWATCH 01 itself. Often these patches are unsuccessful for apparent technical reasons. Many of the successful patches are often noticable for their "echo'y" audio and telco-type feedback ("whales"). Rarely NIGHTWATCH 01 has been monitored making phonepatches that, when initiated, consist of sign/counter-sign conversations. And, every now and then a patch will consist of apparent operational matters over an above a simple "hello goodbye". Does not seem to take an active role in the nets otherwise. Per Bruce G. Blair in his 1985 "Strategic Command and Control" book, page 109, the ANMCC maintains ground links with various unified and specified commands; and radio links with the NEACP. The ANMCC's apparent role is to effect an orderly transition of control from the NMCC (Pentagon) to the NEACP during 'tactical attack warning.' This would be from McNamara's time in the early sixties. Still true today?? When NIGHTWATCH 01 is in 'monitor-only' mode, WAR 46 will stay in contact with NIGHTWATCH 01 via LL (landline.)
Two indications of this from monitoring:
1: A long quiet freqency will suddenly light up with WAR 46 calling and working NIGHTWATCH 01, with NIGHTWATCH 01 telling WAR 46 that NIGHTWATCH 01 will now terminate the landline.
2: WAR 46 will call NIGHTWATCH 01 on a long quiet frequency with no response. A few minutes later WAR 46 will again call NIGHTWATCH 01 and this time raise NIGHTWATCH 01.
It happens often, and there is a sense that WAR 46 worked NIGHTWATCH 01 between the two HF calls on the landline to get his attention. In the minds of a recent TACAMO crew, both stations (NW01 and WAR46) seem to be of equal importance to them. (May 1995.) WAR 46 MOBILE No better than weak levels here. Usually works WAR 46 for signal checks. When heard he is also usually attempting to work NIGHTWATCH 01 (no successful comm has been heard here). Usually heard around 1500z+/- during standard time periods and 1400z during daylight savings time (10:00 AM ET). WGY ### Very rare FEMA participants in these nets. WGY 912 Per Callsign Directory: FEMA Special Facility at Berryville, VA. Only heard during selfdescribed 'exercises.' Provides open phonepatches to other (non listed) WGY### callsigns. As with WAR46, WGY912 has a very powerful signal at my location. WGY 913 FEMA location. Per Larry Van Horn in Sept 95 MT, WGY 913 is believed to be located in Winchester, Virginia. Function???? Participated once through open patch from WGY912 (03/22/95 during massive comm exercise.)
He 'aliased' himself to one callsign before 0000z(DOOLITTLE), and another callsign (FASTBALL) after 0000z. Periodially sent 'test' messages that consisted of a single trigraph (or maybe a three letter acronym, but I don't think so, since the thing would increment by one letter or so at each test.) Example: FAK WGY 918 FEMA location. Said to be a Denver FEMA MERS vehicle. Heard referenced when NIGHTWATCH 04 (female opr) tried calling WGY 918 back in Feb 95 with no response on 11243.0. BRANDY and "A" callsigns: BRANDY was often heard during apparent exercises involving the WGY ## calls on 'FEMA' freqs and frequencies such as 11243.0 (11244.0 after maybe sometime in 1995 or 1996) and 9023.0. This station would usually pass HFU SB "datetimegroup" (obviously "HF USB" dtg) messages between himself and other participants in these nets, some of whom would be NIGHTWATCH 01 and/or other players in the NIGHTWATCH net. Sometime during the mid-90s these HFUSB messages were "shortened" to simply HOTEL dtg messages. The location of BRANDY is unknown and many hobbyists sort of assume that it is located at BRANDYWINE, Md. However during one such exercise in the mid-90s BRANDY was active on 9023.0. At one point it appeared that his audio became very distorted and very "choppy" almost as if it were bad broad CW. It probably was because someone privately wondered why KKN50 (the, uh, "State Department") was transmitting it's CW marker on 9023.0 at that time(!).
This suggests a Virginia location. BRANDY has not been heard by me since maybe 1997 or so; definitely not noticed in 1998 by me and I can recall no reported logging of them in 1998. It was very common prior to this and heard often throughout the 90s. "A" callsigns These exercises are now noticable because many of the participants use "long" callsigns that begin with the letter "A". As with the above players these stations also pass "HOTEL" dtg messages. Very noticable in the past two years [written in 1998]. They apparently do not participate directly in the NIGHTWATCH nets but appear to sometimes exchange "HOTEL" messages with players in the NIGHTWATCH nets during certain apparent exercises. "Callsign" ## VARIABLE 13 calling GUNBOAT 11 Jul 94 AIRCRAFT 054 wkg NIGHTWATCH getting players in the net on 04 Oct 1994. LOOK ## - Not in the net, but working NIGHTWATCH on a net freq, and aware of the surrounding net. [Question for future investigation: will the LOOK ## callsign be heard again after 25 Sept 1998? The E-6Bs seem to be using callsigns such as RAZZ ## or PUP ##]. Activity in late Spring 94 involving very weak stations with numeric suffixes, and maybe single alpha character calls. "GORDO" ## Very rare - heard only once or twice over last 12 months (96) as a participant in a NIGHTWATCH net, mostly informally. [Still rarely heard as of 1998; ? in 1999]. Alternate (frontend) callsign for E4 ex OFFUTT.
NIGHTWATCH Initially presumed to be separate station in Spring 94. Problem is that as a net progresses, the operators get lax, and start refering to the NIGHTWATCH ## callsigns as 'NIGHTWATCH.' Think of it as NIGHTWATCH 01 without the suffix. TROUT 99 I'm assuming that my one logging of them with a net participant (SYRACUSE) was due to possible equipment T&E - plus the two stations were run off their freq by unid station (presumed ANDREWS or OFFUTT as it was a known MYSTIC STAR freq) and told to basicaly get back to work). AWACS AWACS aircraft will contact NIGHTWATCH 01 on the net primary working frequency for a quick hi 'n bye signal check. Before they depart the frequency they will always go through the challange process with NIGHTWATCH 01. NIGHTWATCH 01 will always welcome these aircraft into the net but in all cases the AWACS operator will beg off, saying that he is just conducting a connectivity check, and go. This activity has been most noticable during 1998 (but not earlier - it was apparently much rarer earlier).
Net frequencies: As of 01 Jun 1996, the NIGHTWATCH nets utilize the "ZULU" bandplan. This bandplan appears to bring the net activity into compliance with the 3khz spacing required in the OR sections of the HF spectrum. The bandplan appears to be a combination of certain "old" XRAY, WHISKEY, PAPA, and SIERRA frequencies used prior to 01 Jun 96, and certain "common" OR frequencies also used as apparent primary discrete frequencies by GHFS stations (frequencies such as 4745.0; 6715.0; 9016.0; 11181.0; 13242.0). Most accurate, up-to-date list will be found maintained on the web site for the World Utility Newsgroup (http://www.gem.net/~berri/wun/) - click your way to the most recent newsletter and then to the Military Frequency List maintained by Graham Tanner. There are usually two frequencies given out initially: the 'primary' and the 'secondary.' Recently, the GHFS and the nets themselves have sometimes been giving out a primary, a secondary, and a tertiary frequency. [Still heard in 1999].
There appear to be no instances of the nets using any frequency other than a ZULU designated frequency. On rare occasion some of the net players might move to a frequency such as 11244.0 for some "backchannel" chatter. The apparent TACAMO's will also sometimes move to CHARLIE designated frequencies to conduct some of their business (see the WUN web page URL above). The lower freqs seem to be kept in use for many hours after local sunrise. It's not until midday or later that they might start moving up in freq. It suggests a 'tight' net grouping. [This was true in the mid 90's during sunspot minimums, but for the second half of 1998+ the nets seem to move to 9016.0 or 10204.0 or higher by North American mid morning; in 1999 they are moving even higher]. NIGHTWATCH 01 apparently tries to keep only 2 HF freqs active at any one time; however, there have been instances where they might juggle more than 2 freqs if the players are having problems hearing each other.
NIGHTWATCH 01 will also apparently sometimes (mostly during large self-described 'exercises') setup specific frequencies for data and 'secure' activity. NIGHTWATCH 01 has also set up a separate freq (again during large exercises) as an 'intercomm' freq to be used between NIGHTWATCH 01 and 02. (5700.0 on 03/22/95 for example.) 1994-mid1998: The EAM initiators in the NIGHTWATCH nets will also simulcast their EAMs on various GHFS freqs (such as 6739.0; 8968.0; 11244.0; and 11175.0 and 17976.0) in addition to the current active net primary freq. Common frequency pairings: 8968.0/15016. Used by players (TACAMOs?) for "repeat" EAM xmsns at h+25/h+55 over a two hour window. Sometimes the players on these freqs are not yet active in the NIGHTWATCH net. 8968.0/11244.0 (11243.0 prior to Dec 94) 6739.0/8968.0/11244.0 July 98+: NIGHTWATCH 01: Usually only heard on net primary working freq but often heard simulcasting on the net secondary frequency as well. 11244.0 11175.0 (only player noted here using this frequency - rare) Maybe also 8992.0 on occasion. Callword Net working frequency and 8992.0/11244.0. 8992.0/11244.0 at h+25/h+55 usually over a 2 hour window. 2nd Callword Net working freq plus 8992.0 and/or 11244.0 and 8968.0 and 11267.0. 8968.0/11267.0 at h+07/h+37 (8968.0 was dropped as a primary GHFS freq on 01 Jul 98 and replaced by 8992.0. Which leads to the question: who is using 8968.0 at this time?) 11267.0 was a former USN HICOM LANT freq - TACAMO LANT is the presumed user.
Monitors in the U.S. Northeast usually report this freq to be at good levels (always at fair levels in Texas; often unheard on 8968.0 during the daylight hours). or 8776.0 at h+15/h+45 (+/-) 8776.0 was a former USN HICOM PAC freq - TACAMO PAC is the presumed user. Monitors in California usually report this freq to be at good levels (always fair to mostly weak levels in Texas). (8996.0 was also heard with EAM activity at the end of March 98 over a 2 to 3 day period at h+25/h+55 but nothing reported since. Suspected USN centric - the USAF usually conforms to the 3khz OR bandplan when they operate within the OR (off route) HF spectrum, and the USN usually does not [8996.0 does not conform to the official bandplan]). Since 01 July 1998 (the date on which the GHFS appeared to drop the use of 8968.0 and 17976.0) the nets appear to use only 8992.0 and 11244.0 for their EAM simulcasts - no instance of them using 6739.0 or 15016.0 for this activity since this date. (Just after the change there were at least a couple of instances where 17976.0 was heard with these transmissions but they have not been reported since the late summer of 1998). The NIGHTWATCH 0# operators do not seem to engage the nets on more than one freq at the same time, with the possible exception of voice/data traffic taking place on one freq while the normal voice traffic is active on another freq (suggesting two different operator positions).
But the multiple voice freqs do not seem to be active at the same time from any one station. (Exception: The EAM broadcaster can be active on 8992.0/11244.0 with an EAM while another operator is working net members on the net primary working frequency). Net interaction with GHFS: Finding 'working frequencies': The standard procedure apparently is for a 'callsigned station' to come up on the GHFS; call MAINSAIL; raise a GHFS station (any GHFS station) and 'request working frequencies for NIGHTWATCH 01.' After a few seconds delay, the GHFS station will give out (usually) accurate working frequencies. If the callsigned station cannot raise NIGHTWATCH 01 on the indicated freqs, he (very rarely she) will come back up on the GHFS and request a phonepatch to NIGHTWATCH 01 to work out some good frequencies. In many cases, NIGHTWATCH 01 is in what they call a 'monitor only period'. In that case, all the callsigned station can do is wait it out if nobody else is 'in the net'. There is an indication that the callsigned stations are actually aware of what freqs they are to use before they contact the GHFS. In early August 95 a station contacted THULE for working freqs, and was told that NIGHTWATCH 01 was in a 'monitor-only' period, and no designators were passed. The callsigned station then gave two designators (S310 and S312), and asked if these were correct. They were. (Rhetorical question: Is this info off something called a 'Daily Status Message?' heard mentioned and described during the March 95 exercise) GHFS frequencies used to 'find the net.'
Prior to 1996, the two most common GHFS frequencies used by new net players to find the net were 11243.0/11244.0 and 8968.0. By 1996, the players seemed to spend more time on 11175.0, and much less time on 11244.0. In 1998+ it's now very rare to find a player attempting to use 11244.0 to obtain this info. They can often be heard calling MAINSAIL on 11244.0 with no response from any GHFS station.
Calling StratComm Wing ONE: Periodically, participants will show up on the GHFS freqs (particularly, but not limited to, 11244.0 and 8968 [11175.0 in 1998+]) looking for phonepatches to DSN 339 numbers. Usually DSN 339 3944 prior to Oct 95, and another DSN 339 number since Oct 95 (VQ4 OPCON) [This is pre July 1998; 8968.0 is no longer in use]. The ground party was always identified as another daily tactical callsign, at least prior to Oct 95. Since Oct 95, the ground party is simply VQ4 OPCON (aka OPCON.) Maybe since 1996 or 1997 they would identify this party as COMMAND CENTER. In late 1998+ they are maybe back to using callsigns to identify these ground parties. They will place phonepatches directly to BOOMTOWN, a static call associated with StratComm Wing ONE at TINKER. These calls are usually to determine if their Whiskey Bravo comms are being properly received; and, to set up voice and data work on CHARLIE 'alphacharacter' freqs (discovered as of early 1999): CA 6691.0 (a very common freq.) CB 11187.0 CC 17982.0 CD ? CE ? CH 11264.0 CJ ? CQ ? The first three known freqs conform to the "new" USN OR freq assignments.
A good assumption is that some of the other unk freqs will also conform to those plans; and, in fact others have found heavy BOOMTOWN activity on certain other USN OR freqs with simple searches. The players in the NIGHTWATCH net will often be caught on these freqs working BOOMTOWN with voice and data. These stations are believed to be E-6A/B's with USN backend crews pulling TACAMO duty. A good number of the patches are placed to send 'immediate precedence' traffic to the ground party that consists of varying numbers of 3-element groups (trigraphs.) [This has not been heard in a year or so - 1998]. Once, the 3-element groups were heard being sent with 'slant' characters; and the 'slant' character (from context of the comms) took up one 3-element group each. In 1999 these stations are heard passing 369 message traffic via phonepatch. A good number of the patches are placed to discuss what they call TACAMO OPS (apparently sometimes shortend to TACOPS.) A good number of the patches are placed to discuss Whiskey Bravo activity. A good number of patches are placed to discuss VQ4 (and sometimes VQ3) administrative matters; parts order status; etc. [Prior to 1998 - post 1998 they are using callwords for the ground party]. A very rare number of patches are used to send FLASH precedence messages.
Sometimes trigraphs, but mostly apparently verbal 'scenarios' or whatnot. Calling PAX RIVER Usually for weather information at ETA. Sometimes for housekeeping activities. Since maybe early 1996, they describe PAX RIVER as VQ4 DET OPCON. [This activity is much rarer since 1996 or so]. NIGHTWATCH 01 connectivity checks. NIGHTWATCH 01 will occasionally pop up on the GHFS to place a phonepatch to OFFUTT DSN prefixes (that identify on the phone as the last 4 digits of the phone number; or sometimes as STRATCOM; or maybe other callsigns) for a very brief 'exercise directed check.' Also sometimes selfdescribed as a connectivity check. NIGHTWATCH 01 will very rarely use WAR46 to place these patches. Since maybe 1998 these NIGHTWATCH 01/WAR 46 phonepatches are now very common [WAR 46 will have equipment problems seeming more than half the time]. 1993/1994: They use the GHFS as 'sources' for something called an 'exercise inject' on the third/next to last Tuesday of many months. [Noticed often in 1993 and 1994 and maybe into 1995 but not heard in the last half of the 90s]. 1994 - Jul 1998: NIGHTWATCH 01 will use the GHFS to raise specific GHFS stations in order that both stations may move to a listed discrete freq for voice and (mostly) data transmissions (for 'injection into AUTODIN.') Stations heard: HICKAM; MCCLELLAN; MACDILL; LAJES. Presumed others such as CROUGHTON. Never heard: ALBROOK, ANDREWS, OFFUTT, BAYONNE, ASCENSION. [MACDILL, ALBROOK and BAYONNE are closed - 1998].
NIGHTWATCH 01 will work ANDREWS (probably VIP) for data work on MYSTIC STAR freqs (see the WUN web site for known frequencies). 1994 - Jul 1998: NIGHTWATCH 01 has been heard working MACDILL on published discretes, where NIGHTWATCH 01 will pass a verbal EAM to MACDILL 'for injection to AUTODIN.' At completion of 'exchange' MACDILL will confirm 'injection', and within seconds will bcst the thing on the GHFS along with rest of GHFS. NIGHTWATCH 01 has also been heard working LAJES with voice EAM injections, in the same manner as MACDILL. NIGHTWATCH 01 has not yet been heard working any other CONUS or non-CONUS station with voice EAM injection requests. Jul 1998+: NIGHTWATCH 01 has been heard working MCCLELLAN with voice EAM traffic to inject into AUTODIN as above. Not yet heard with LAJES (and LAJES is now [1999] somewhat limited in frequency usage [4724.0/15016.0]). NIGHTWATCH 01 will work ANDREWS (VIP) on MYSTIC STAR frequencies in data comms. NIGHTWATCH 01 will work MCCLELLAN and ANDREWS (GLOBAL; this appears to be new) on GHFS discrete frequencies for data traffic for injection to AUTODIN and to test comms from MCCCLELLAN and ANDREWS to NIGHTWATCH 01. Net activity The nets are usually more 'quiet' than active on a day to day basis. Heavy activity apparently only during lots of EAM activity. Heavy activity during self described 'exercises.' Entering and exiting the nets. Callsigned station gets working freqs from GHFS. Callsigned station goes to primary freq, and calls NIGHTWATCH 01.
If successful, callsigned station requests a check on secondary. Sometimes NIGHTWATCH 01 is not active, but another callsigned station is filling in for NIGHTWATCH 01. This backup station will perform NIGHTWATCH's duties for this procedure. Since early Fall of 1998 this no longer seems to be true except on a sporadic basis. If anything it appears that the players are unsure of what to do in the absense of NIGHTWATCH 01. A player other than NIGHTWATCH 01 will now perform the challange procedure, but it now appears to be done only at the direction of NIGHTWATCH 01 (in the event that NIGHTWATCH 01 is unable to have successful comms with the entering or leaving station). If successful (or even if unsuccessful on secondary), callsigned station requests to 'enter the net,' through the challange process. Since 01 July 1996, the "authenticators" of the challange process have changed from 2-character strings to 3-character strings with the first character either an "A", "B" or "C", and the last two characters date/time dependent. If they are 'successful' in this procedure (I've never heard one that wasn't, at least after 2 tries), then the new player is shown 'in the net' at a 'timestamp.' As of very late 1996, this is no longer true, probably as a result of the new 3-character challange process.
The player with the problem was asked by NIGHTWATCH 01 to contact NIGHTWATCH 01 by secure telephone link to complete the process. 0440z 19 Mar 96; 5700.0: CRAZYWEED attempts to enter the net with NIGHTWATCH 01. CRAZYWEED could not get the challange process right, so NW01 advised CRAZYWEED to check his date and time, and call back. That done, it still was not correct. NIGHTWATCH 01 then instructed CRAZYWEED to verify that he was using "day 19 and 0311z" (the current utc time.) That done, the challange process was successful. Exiting the net uses exactly the same authentication procedure. If the departing station cannot raise anyone, he will perform this procedure 'in the blind.' Since 01 Jul 96, players exiting the net in the blind do so using 2-character authenticators, not three (date/time dependent). During net activity (an exercise), I have heard one instance of a callsigned station saying that he has heard someone else using his callsign, and he immediately issues a 'challange.' He and the ncs immediately perform another 'authentication' procedure to verify the station's authenticity.
Stations that DO NOT authenticate into or out of the nets:
NIGHTWATCH 01 (and 02-04) Sometimes not true, at least since late 1998. NIGHTWATCH 01 was challanged into the net after a lengthy absence at the conclusion of a foreign trip by POTUS. NIGHTWATCH 02 has been issued a challange at least once in the past year. WAR46 WGY### stations. GORDO ## - extremely rare activity. Shortcallsign ## - extrememly rare activity. Since sometime in 1996, there are now cases where a callsigned station will get the working frequencies from a GHFS station; call and raise NIGHTWATCH 01 on the working frequency; but when NIGHTWATCH 01 asks the station if he wishes to enter the net, the answer is negative. Suspected TACAMOs. Possible procedure change: On 11 Dec 95 MOTORIST worked HICKAM with a phonepatch to NIGHTWATCH 01, and MOTORIST used the patch to enter the net as above with the challange process. A day or so later, Ed Griffin heard a station work HICKAM who patched NIGHTWATCH 01 and used the patch to exit the net. This is certainly easier than exiting the net 'in the blind.' However, no such event has been heard then since these logs, at least to my knowledge - they still do this stuff in the blind. Also performed at 0805z 17 Mar 96: OVERREACH (maybe) working HICKAM with phonepatch to NW01, entering the net via the patch. (Phonepatch challanges are still heard on a very rare basis into 1999).
The above information also points out a peculiar nature of the net probably having to do with the apparent fact that most players in the nets are TACAMOs (pre 1998 info). In spite of conventional wisdom, NIGHTWATCH 01 is *not* aware of the status of most of his net players unless they stay in touch with NIGHTWATCH 01 by means of periodic HF voice check; presumed WB (WHISKEY BRAVO) data circuit comms; or by means of GHFS phonepatch. He has no "backchannel" to most of his players. NIGHTWATCH 01 is often unaware that certain of his players have left his net in the blind hours earlier. A probable indication that certain of the players do not yet have the comm equipment necessary to perform these comms, and probably won't have it until they complete their "upgrade" (maybe to the E-6B) - if then. "HF Monitor-only periods" NIGHTWATCH 01 will on ocassion go into a self-described 'HF monitor -only period.' These can last from 10/20 minutes, up to hours. It has been suggested that the shorter periods are for fueling purposes, and the longer periods are for maintenance work. A recent GHFS converstation confirms the 'maintenance' guess (or, at least confirms one reason.) [written in 1995; it's much more common now to hear the reason given for monitor only periods (usually maintenance related)]. It has been noticed since late 1995 that now often certain players in the net other than NIGHTWATCH 01 will also announce that they are going into "monitor only" mode, sometimes for hours. Often, this will be announced soon after they enter the nets. It has been suggested that these are TACAMOs that are ready to assume their vlf tranmission orbits. Activity: Freqs generally quite. Usually on the primary and/or secondary freqs (but not always), the callsigned station that seems to xmit the EAMs to the net will simply pop up on freq and start broadcasting an EAM. No announcement, no general calls, just start bcsting. Sometimes, this station will then call the other players in the nets and verify that they received the traffic. Sometimes they don't, and it's these times when there may be a sense of 'disconnectedness' with these bcsts and the other players. Just a feeling, maybe valid, maybe not. Sometimes there seems to be a duality at work here, or maybe not.
Sometimes NIGHTWATCH 01 will start an EAM. At the completion of the EAM he/she will ask the players in the net if they received their 'traffic.' Sometimes (usually during the self-id'd exercises) most (maybe all) the callsigned stations will start broadcasting their EAMs - it can get very noisy and confusing during this activity. There are the ocassional voice checks in 'secure' mode using ANDVT. The first instance I caught of ANDVT comms in the net appeared in Feb 95. Prior to this, all the secure comms in the nets appeared to be in PARKHILL. Then, as if a switch was thrown, the comms were in ANDVT. As of Oct or Nov 95, for a short time in the net, there was some occasional use of PARKHILL. Not heard since maybe Nov 95. There is very rare housekeeping activities on these freqs, usually only during their rare self-id'd exercises. Chitchat about things that are not normally heard on the nets such as schedules etc. Examples: Discussion of "Full Summary Messages" (via WB); "Daily Status Messages"; etc. Note: Since the middle of 1998, there is much more technical chatter between the players often involving their GEP activity. It's suspected that this is due to the equipment upgrades on the USN's E-6(B) TACAMO aircraft. Net activity has been recently described, on one day, as 'training'. There is never any known bomber/tanker activity heard on these nets since 01 Jun 92. The nets appear to be a communications coordination (connectivity) net that exits to pass their "traffic".. The activity is daily, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
NIGHTWATCH 01
I am not sure that I should be publishing this, but it is certainly interesting. The following details radio traffic used by the Alternate Joint Communication Center (AJCC) and the National Military Command Center (NMCC) at Raven Rock, Pennsylvania. I don't completely understand it, so don't ask.
On, or no later than, Monday 21 March 1994 (and heard active with ANDREWS VIP on utc 19 March 1994) the callsign "NIGHTWATCH 01" was utilized as the static callsign for the Net Control Station of the High Frequency radio net now known as the "NIGHTWATCH net" [prior to this date the NCS was identified as a daily changing tactical callword of between 9 and 7 characters in length, a practice that had been in effect for many years].
The identity of the HF NCS remained "NIGHTWATCH 01" from at least March 1994 (with one known exception) up to the end of February or the first day of March 1999. At 0000z (or slightly later) 23 January 1999 the station known as NIGHTWATCH 01 was aliased to a daily changing tactical callword, and utilized a daily changing callsign over the next three days (UTC) [RAILROAD; JAYWALK; HAILSTORM]. On 26 January 1999 the NCS reverted to the static callsign NIGHTWATCH 01 [with indications that certain players in his net were expecting the use of RAINCOAT and GAS HOUSE on the 26th and 27th of January]. Possibly on Saturday 27 February 1999 [HAPPY DAY], but in any case no later than Monday 01 March 1999 the station known as "NIGHTWATCH 01" again was aliased to a daily changing tactical callword and has remained aliased since that date. In addition all other static identities, with the exception of WAR 46, have been aliased to daily changing tactical callsigns as well.
These identities include the front end callsigns of the UFAF's E-4Bs (GORDO ## to daily changing 5-character callsigns), WALDORF, Ground Entry Points (GEP's), Air Force alert pad locations, etc. [Or at least their intention to remain aliased is noticable even though there are many times in which there are exceptions when the locations are identified by their command static names]. The following was complied over a period of time beginning in late 1994 and does not reflect the change to daily changing tactical callsigns on the part of NIGHTWATCH 01 and some of the other static callsigned players.
However, as of now even though NIGHTWATCH 01 is aliased to a callword the net activity still fits the "template" of pre March 1999 activity with all players still usually recognizable [except for NIGHTWATCH 02/03/04; it is suspected that 02 would still be recognizable due to certain patterns of behavior unique to him, but it's only speculation]. But as always, the net still appears to be undergoing a steady evolution of unknown resolution.
Net participants: Net control station Usually, NIGHTWATCH 01. When NIGHTWATCH 01 is in his/her 'monitor only' period, it appears that another net participant gets partial ncs duties, but not always. Since October 1998 (+/-) it is very noticable that there is almost always no accomplished net control station in the absence of NIGHTWATCH 01. Daily changing tactical callsigned stations WAR46 WAR 46 MOBILE WGY### (FEMA activity implied), sometimes 'aliased' to a callsign. 'Callsign' ## - extremely rare 'GORDO' ## - *extremely* rare NIGHTWATCH 02 through 04. NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA NIGHTWATCH 04 CHARLIE NIGHTWATCH - Probably a sign of lax practices on the net, where they start dropping the suffix.
AWACS using their "backend" identities (DARKSTAR NOVEMBER etc) (Possibly TROUT 99 once, and maybe not - active with a player.) Callsign information NIGHTWATCH ## Heard: NIGHTWATCH 01 - most common callsign NIGHTWATCH 02 NIGHTWATCH 03 NIGHTWATCH 04 NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA NIGHTWATCH 04 CHARLIE NIGHTWATCH 01: Callsign was apparently activated 21 Mar 94 (or, at least very near that date) as the NCS for it's nets. Prior to 21 Mar 94, the NCS was usually a 9-character callsigned station. Seems to be active 24 hours a day (even when he's not active.
However, from the latter half of 1998 NIGHTWATCH 01 would be noticably out of the net for extended periods during major Presidential trips out of the country. Prior to this time the "decapitation" seemed to be for much shorter timeperiods, if at all, during Presidential foreign trips). Often he is apparently parked on a ramp somewhere, but active. (When on the ground at DYESS and BARKSDALE his signal is usually unheard here - his signal will "skip" over my location) Can be reached at various DSN numbers: In the states, most common DSN is the 939 prefix. During a phonepatch in Dec 96, it was alluded that the GHFS station [MACDILL, now closed] had a total of 5 DSN numbers assigned to NIGHTWATCH 01. Twice during active net activity in late 1994, NIGHTWATCH 01 was described by a player as the "kneecap" [NEACP].
During Oct/Nov 1995 net activity (and later), he was described as "nay-ok" [NAOC] which would reflect the 1994 "name" change from NEACP to NAOC. NIGHTWATCH 01 apparently uses other callsigns: CHALICE BRAVO (AWACS) placed patch (1994) via GHFS to CASELOAD. When patch was activated, the called party id'ed himself as NIGHTWATCH 01. CHALICE BRAVO refused to talk to this station (despite urging of GHFS opr and NIGHTWATCH 01 opr) until NIGHTWATCH 01 opr id'd himself as CASELOAD. Comms can be conducted by two or more operators (male and/or female), sometimes at the same time. And sometimes during extended sentences and challanges on the nets, part of the comm can be by two different operators sometimes literally in the same sentence. In 1994, NIGHTWATCH 01 would attempt phonepatch service for a player in the net (a call to the DSN 339 prefix associated with StratComm Wing ONE at TINKER); and he attempted to place another phonepatch on another day for an ACME ## (who had called MAINSAIL, and raised WARLORD instead, acting as sort of a go-fer for NW01) on the GHFS to another DSN 339 number (unsuccessful). [While editing this in 1999 it suddenly struck me that ACME ## was a TACAMO calling a location at StratComm Wing 1]. 1999: These phonepatch attempts are very rare but have been heard in the years since 1994.
Since 1998 (since shortly after 25 September 1998) NIGHTWATCH 01 has acted as apparent designated contact party between certain players in the daily nets and WALDORF. The players (obvious E-6Bs) will raise NIGHTWATCH 01 to request that NIGHTWATCH 01 contact WALDORF to set up comms via numbered RF channels/configurations and by particular Ground Entry Points: GEP points heard (here) in the nets since 1998: OFFUTT LAMAR NOBLE (OK) HILLSBORO ALBUQUERQUE BARKSDALE SIGNAL MOUNTAIN (TN) WILLIAMS ("AFB") JASPER STRAWBERRY PEAK Plus: WRIGHT PAT GREEN HILL ELLSIVILLE (FL) (And maybe others) If the callsigns cannot reach NIGHTWATCH 01 via the HF net frequencies then they have been known to contact NIGHTWATCH 01 via GHFS phonepatch to coordinate this activity. Prior to shortly after 25 Sept 1998 the callsigns would contact WALDORF directly via GHFS phonepatch through a commercial toll-free telephone number. As of early Oct 1998 or so it is now very rare (but no unheard of) for the callsigns to place these requests directly, particularly if NIGHTWATCH 01 is in a monitor only mode or is out of contact of the net.. NIGHTWATCH 02: Tentative. NIGHTWATCH 02 seems to become very active during major comm exercises. NIGHTWATCH 02 apparently does not assume a 'lead' role during it's activity. It seems to 'defer' to NIGHTWATCH 01. It's role does not appear to be passive, but it is much less active than NIGHTWATCH 01.
Two major examples of when NIGHTWATCH 02 played much more than a passive role: 22/23 (UTC) Mar 95: A massive net participating in a 12 hour exercise (1800z+/- to 0600z+/-), with NIGHTWATCH 01 and NIGHTWATCH 02 very active (by local evening they were using 5700.0 as a 'backchannel' while the net was active elsewhere.)
1. NIGHTWATCH 02 would pass in-the-blind "three-six- nine messages" to the net: at 2008z 22 Mar 95, the 369 message was preceeded with a call to NORMANDY. (It may have been a code word in the manner of SKYMASTER - there was no NORMANDY heard in the net at any time that day.) Additional information: There is now (post 1997) heavy use of the callword SKYMASTER when they preface their AKAC 3-6-9 messages during these exercises (late October and March are two heavy exercise periods). SKYMASTER appears to be a general call to any airborne command post. Although only recently noted during these exercises the callword was said to have been heard in the late 80s on certain UHF circuits.
2. The NIGHTWATCH 02 operator was definitely *not* USN. At 1957z, PROLOGUE calls NIGHTWATCH 02 ("Two"), then calls CLAYBIRD (very high up in that net's pecking order), and asks CLAYBIRD to get the coordinates for NIGHTWATCH 02's "Playground". CLAYBIRD did so, and NIGHTWATCH 02 responded with a "request for spelling of callsign PLAYGROUND." This went round and round for 30 seconds, so CLAYBIRD (with a noticable "smile" in his voice) said that they want *YOUR* Playground. With a "roger, roger," NIGHTWATCH 02 advised that he now understood, and requested (and used) ANDVT comms. NIGHTWATCH 02, of all the NIGHTWATCHs (other than 01) is the most active of all, when he is active on days other than exercise days. Yet, this activity is still rare. NIGHTWATCH 02 has certain characteristics/practices that are unique to him alone of all the net players in his dealings with NIGHTWATCH 01.
NIGHTWATCH 03-04: *Very rare*. Not heard by me in *any* active exercise; only heard on apparently random days. (During one week NIGHTWATCH 04 (female opr) was caught on a couple of days calling WGY 918 (Denver - and I got the strangest feeling from her station's sound that she was over the Western U.S. - a propagation thing.)
NIGHTWATCH 04 'alphacharacter'
On 17 Aug 95, NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA periodically called NIGHTWATCH 04 CHARLIE (aka NIGHTWATCH 04 'see'). This kind of suffixed call as it applies to the NIGHTWATCH 0# is new to me and to others. These calls were active on a day during which NIGHTWATCH 01 maintained a large active net on that day's HF net frequency and NIGHTWATCH 02, 03, and 04 were all active on 11243.0. It was during these comms that the NIGHTWATCH 04 LIMA and CHARLIE comms were heard. Daily Tactical Callsigns. Mostly consist of eight character callsigns, at least since Mar 94. Now not true as of fall of 95. There are now lots of 7 and 9 character calls active, all seemingly USN assets (TACAMOs probably.) [Written prior to 01 October 1998. but character count info still valid as of 1998]. There are also 9-character and 7-character callsigns as well. *Very* rarely there are 6-character callsigns. Significance of the 6-character call? Very rarely there are 5-character callsigns: BANKS, SUSAN, EVANS, NOTED, etc. (Rhetorical question: are the 5-character callsigns, which are almost always persons' names, maybe ground stations??
The TACAMOs have been heard discussing 5 character callsigns on ocassion. EVANS is definitely associated with StratComm Wing ONE, and is apparently 'static.' [EVANS is often referenced by the players when they are discussing their WHISKEY BRAVO comms in phonepatches with BOOMTOWN]. NOTED is another 5-character callsign that appears often in TACAMO oriented conversations; it is not clear from context if NOTED is just another airborne player or if he is something else. Another rhetorical question: are the MCC's (Mobile "National" Command Centers) still active, and do/did they ever show up in the nets aliased to callwords, either pre or post 01 Jun 92? And, there are still very rare occasions where there are 10 to 12-character callsigns (but nothing larger.) SILVERDOLLAR; GOLD DIGGER. Prior to Mar 94, RESETTLEMENT. These were usually heard during apparent exercises. SILVER DOLLAR was heard on a day when the players in the nets were conducting the once common monthly "Exercise Inject" activity on the GHFS. Information about the callsigns: (1994-1998): One of the participants is a daily tactical callsign that initiates the EAMs into the nets. Separate from NIGHTWATCH 01 who also will bcst EAMs.
Apparently, the same station each day with a different callsign (presumed 'glass but not always). In many cases the operators are recognizable day to day. (Many have distinctive comm "habbits"/ mannerisms or distinctive regional accents). The operator is almost always male. Female operator only heard twice in during 1994/95. No longer the case - female operators are not nearly as common as male operators but are no longer rarely heard. The diction of the operators is very distinctive. The background noise level is quite high. Voices reading alphanumeric character strings. Voices calling out trigraph callsigns (sounds USN) Not noticed as much in 1997+. Sometimes rarely, 'warble tones' heard in background (very rare) Sometime this station maybe comes up on freq with a 'growl' of a transmitter tuneup device. Mostly he justs pops up.
On 20 Feb 96, VALHALLA popped up for 10 seconds with keyed transmitter that sounded just like the sounds a number station makes both pre and post traffic; then he was into his EAM. Seems to be about the same signal strength each day at my location (fair levels only; changed in 1998). Most of the callsigns in the nets are USN assets (TACAMOs). Distinctive USN comm chatter. Distinctive USN rank/rating chatter. They spend lots of time on the GHFS calling TINKER DSN 339 numbers - StratComm Wing 1. Prior to Oct 95 (or maybe earlier): Most common number: 339 3944, always id'd by a callword, sometimes remaining static over two days, but usually changing on a daily basis. If they called VQ4 OPCON, they placed phonepatches to DSN 326 numbers - PAX RIVER. Since the Spring of 1996, the DSN prefix is now 342. 1998: This number is now very rarely heard. From Oct 95 (Nov 95, for sure), *all* VQ4 OPCON (aka OPCON) go to a single DSN 339 number, and the use of the callwords has mostly dissappeared, with the exception of BOOMTOWN, which is a static call, and has it's own "position" within viewing and shouting distance (apparently) of the VQ4 OPCON guys. Mentions of VQ3 (OPCON) were/are much rarer [1998 and earlier]. They have their own DSN 339 number. Maybe starting in late 1996 (or maybe early 1997) many of these calls were id'd as COMMAND CENTER. As of late 1998 they may be back to using callwords for their id's instead of in-the-clear identifications.
At an airshow in mid 1995, members of a TACAMO crew confirmed that they are heavy participants with NIGHTWATCH 01 and WAR46 (although they did not directly confirm or discuss participation in the nets, nor would they discuss the nature of the nets and their participants - but they did confirm that they are often heard on HF with their "restorals" - the xmsn of their "traffic" (the EAMs)). Just guessing, but I suspect that on most days (those days when it is not just NIGHTWATCH 01 and one or two callsigns (TACAMOs)), the nets consist mostly of all TACAMOs, plus NIGHTWATCH 01 and one other probable non-TACAMO callsigned aircraft - maybe USAF, plus the EAM initiator. Just guessing, though. [This was before 25 Sep 1998. After this date there were no EC135Cs active in these nets]. And, just maybe one of these USN 'assets' is not airborne at all, particularly during exercises. The USN has been an active player in these nets since maybe June 1992 (August 1992 for sure.) On 19 Aug 92 (the first day that I noticed the *heavy* USN lingo on these nets) the ncs OUTSPOKEN (9-characters) directed CROWNSAW to pass OUTSPOKEN's traffic (GVNMTM..) to SIERRA ONE WHISKEY.
A quick spin through the memories found CROWNSAW on 11255.0 (location of a *very* active USN net), except CROWNSAW was now B1V calling S1W, trying to pass his traffic. A late 1996 issue of Aviation Week and Space Technology indicated that the TACAMO's have been active with comms for the bombers and missile silos since 1990. Also alluded to in a 12 Jun 95 article on the TACAMO "Looking Glass" upgrade in Aviation Week and Space Technology. (late 1998 and later): The EAM broadcaster: One of three stations on "normal" days: Most common: a station using a daily changing callword. Almost always at good or better signal levels here. Common: NIGHTWATCH 01 (1999: aliased to callword). Varies in signal strength from day to day and hour to hour. Not rare: another station aliased to a daily tactical callword, and heard on certain "USN" HF frequencies as well. Signal strength varies, but usually at no better than fair levels here. Since 1998 some of these stations (including NIGHTWATCH 01) will pop up on a frequency approximately 500hz "high" and noticable move down in frequency to zero beat the proper frequency - this was explained by one NIGHTWATCH 01 operator to a questioning callsign operator as being the result a transmitter being just turned on and quickly "warming up" (!). [From comm chatter, there was apparently a major equipment upgrade performed in 1997 or 1998]. 'Daily Tactical callsign' stations with numeric suffixes: On 22 Aug 95, SEAOTTER was a very active player in that night's NIGHTWATCH net on 6730.0. At 0415z+, a station id'ing as SEAOTTER TWO periodically calls SEAOTTER THREE, with no response. This kind of suffixed 'daily tactical callsign' is very new to me in reference to these nets (or anywhere else, for that matter.) On 24 Aug 95, GUIDEPOST (female opr, and the EAM initiator to the Net), id'd herself later as GUIDEPOST 01, working GUIDEPOST 02 (male opr.) Approx 30 min. later, female opr, now iding as GUIDEPOST 02, worked the male opr, iding as GUIDEPOST 01, and checked GUIDEPOST 01 out of the net with the 'challange' process. ????? On 07 Nov 95, FACECARD 02 seemed to replace FACECARD 01 in the net, and FACECARD 02 seemed to become FACECARD. The above suggests that during these periods of time, the callsign is to remain static, but the a/c is replaced. A hand-off. [No instance of this was heard in 1998]. TACAMO PAC and TACAMO CENT mentioned in the NIGHTWATCH net of 31 Dec 96 on 9016.0; probably aliased to callwords (at the time, maybe DIGNIFIED and DOORKNOB).
WAR46 FORT RICHIE, Md. (Site "R" - Raven Rock, PA..)
Seems to check in near top of hour and around H+40 for signal checks with NIGHTWATCH 01 only. (He can check in at any time, though; but, as a general rule the H+40/45 time frame seems to hold on many days.) [This was true at the time but does not seem to be the case in 1998]. He (female oprs are *very* rare here: 06 Oct 95 for instance) [still true as of 1998+] has vary rarely worked callsign stations though in the past, mostly to advise that NIGHTWATCH 01 is 'monitor-only.' Does not engage in chatter, otherwise - seemingly ignoring requests for info from callsigned stations. In 1998 NIGHTWATCH 01 would sometimes use WAR 46 to contact stations that NIGHTWATCH 01 was having problems hearing. Prior to 21 Mar 94, WAR46 would often work the callword statons active in the net, presumably the ncs (who seemed to be mostly 9-character calls prior to 21 Mar 94, which may or may not suggest that the 9-character callsign was the JCS's NEACP). Seems to constantly monitor the nets. Very powerful signal at my location (usually much stronger than the players in the net at my location, including NIGHTWATCH 01.) He's powerful to me even on days that NW01 cannot hear WAR46's calls to NW01. (But not always. Since 1997 there have been days when he is barely heard here; maybe an effect of changing propagation with the increase in solar activity). NIGHTWATCH 01 will rarely use WAR46 to place phonepatches.
Recent DSN number was described as "seven figures", and not by it's actual number (which was at OFFUTT.) WAR46 was also caught once (in late 1994) placing a phonepatch to a DSN 339 number for a non-NIGHWATCH player in the net. NIGHTWATCH 01 was also caught once in 1994 attempting this as well for a player. In the past year or so [1998] NIGHTWATCH 01 will often raise WAR 46 for quick hi 'n bye connectivity checks with certain DSN numbers usually associated with NIGHTWATCH 01 itself. Often these patches are unsuccessful for apparent technical reasons. Many of the successful patches are often noticable for their "echo'y" audio and telco-type feedback ("whales"). Rarely NIGHTWATCH 01 has been monitored making phonepatches that, when initiated, consist of sign/counter-sign conversations. And, every now and then a patch will consist of apparent operational matters over an above a simple "hello goodbye". Does not seem to take an active role in the nets otherwise. Per Bruce G. Blair in his 1985 "Strategic Command and Control" book, page 109, the ANMCC maintains ground links with various unified and specified commands; and radio links with the NEACP. The ANMCC's apparent role is to effect an orderly transition of control from the NMCC (Pentagon) to the NEACP during 'tactical attack warning.' This would be from McNamara's time in the early sixties. Still true today?? When NIGHTWATCH 01 is in 'monitor-only' mode, WAR 46 will stay in contact with NIGHTWATCH 01 via LL (landline.)
Two indications of this from monitoring:
1: A long quiet freqency will suddenly light up with WAR 46 calling and working NIGHTWATCH 01, with NIGHTWATCH 01 telling WAR 46 that NIGHTWATCH 01 will now terminate the landline.
2: WAR 46 will call NIGHTWATCH 01 on a long quiet frequency with no response. A few minutes later WAR 46 will again call NIGHTWATCH 01 and this time raise NIGHTWATCH 01.
It happens often, and there is a sense that WAR 46 worked NIGHTWATCH 01 between the two HF calls on the landline to get his attention. In the minds of a recent TACAMO crew, both stations (NW01 and WAR46) seem to be of equal importance to them. (May 1995.) WAR 46 MOBILE No better than weak levels here. Usually works WAR 46 for signal checks. When heard he is also usually attempting to work NIGHTWATCH 01 (no successful comm has been heard here). Usually heard around 1500z+/- during standard time periods and 1400z during daylight savings time (10:00 AM ET). WGY ### Very rare FEMA participants in these nets. WGY 912 Per Callsign Directory: FEMA Special Facility at Berryville, VA. Only heard during selfdescribed 'exercises.' Provides open phonepatches to other (non listed) WGY### callsigns. As with WAR46, WGY912 has a very powerful signal at my location. WGY 913 FEMA location. Per Larry Van Horn in Sept 95 MT, WGY 913 is believed to be located in Winchester, Virginia. Function???? Participated once through open patch from WGY912 (03/22/95 during massive comm exercise.)
He 'aliased' himself to one callsign before 0000z(DOOLITTLE), and another callsign (FASTBALL) after 0000z. Periodially sent 'test' messages that consisted of a single trigraph (or maybe a three letter acronym, but I don't think so, since the thing would increment by one letter or so at each test.) Example: FAK WGY 918 FEMA location. Said to be a Denver FEMA MERS vehicle. Heard referenced when NIGHTWATCH 04 (female opr) tried calling WGY 918 back in Feb 95 with no response on 11243.0. BRANDY and "A" callsigns: BRANDY was often heard during apparent exercises involving the WGY ## calls on 'FEMA' freqs and frequencies such as 11243.0 (11244.0 after maybe sometime in 1995 or 1996) and 9023.0. This station would usually pass HFU SB "datetimegroup" (obviously "HF USB" dtg) messages between himself and other participants in these nets, some of whom would be NIGHTWATCH 01 and/or other players in the NIGHTWATCH net. Sometime during the mid-90s these HFUSB messages were "shortened" to simply HOTEL dtg messages. The location of BRANDY is unknown and many hobbyists sort of assume that it is located at BRANDYWINE, Md. However during one such exercise in the mid-90s BRANDY was active on 9023.0. At one point it appeared that his audio became very distorted and very "choppy" almost as if it were bad broad CW. It probably was because someone privately wondered why KKN50 (the, uh, "State Department") was transmitting it's CW marker on 9023.0 at that time(!).
This suggests a Virginia location. BRANDY has not been heard by me since maybe 1997 or so; definitely not noticed in 1998 by me and I can recall no reported logging of them in 1998. It was very common prior to this and heard often throughout the 90s. "A" callsigns These exercises are now noticable because many of the participants use "long" callsigns that begin with the letter "A". As with the above players these stations also pass "HOTEL" dtg messages. Very noticable in the past two years [written in 1998]. They apparently do not participate directly in the NIGHTWATCH nets but appear to sometimes exchange "HOTEL" messages with players in the NIGHTWATCH nets during certain apparent exercises. "Callsign" ## VARIABLE 13 calling GUNBOAT 11 Jul 94 AIRCRAFT 054 wkg NIGHTWATCH getting players in the net on 04 Oct 1994. LOOK ## - Not in the net, but working NIGHTWATCH on a net freq, and aware of the surrounding net. [Question for future investigation: will the LOOK ## callsign be heard again after 25 Sept 1998? The E-6Bs seem to be using callsigns such as RAZZ ## or PUP ##]. Activity in late Spring 94 involving very weak stations with numeric suffixes, and maybe single alpha character calls. "GORDO" ## Very rare - heard only once or twice over last 12 months (96) as a participant in a NIGHTWATCH net, mostly informally. [Still rarely heard as of 1998; ? in 1999]. Alternate (frontend) callsign for E4 ex OFFUTT.
NIGHTWATCH Initially presumed to be separate station in Spring 94. Problem is that as a net progresses, the operators get lax, and start refering to the NIGHTWATCH ## callsigns as 'NIGHTWATCH.' Think of it as NIGHTWATCH 01 without the suffix. TROUT 99 I'm assuming that my one logging of them with a net participant (SYRACUSE) was due to possible equipment T&E - plus the two stations were run off their freq by unid station (presumed ANDREWS or OFFUTT as it was a known MYSTIC STAR freq) and told to basicaly get back to work). AWACS AWACS aircraft will contact NIGHTWATCH 01 on the net primary working frequency for a quick hi 'n bye signal check. Before they depart the frequency they will always go through the challange process with NIGHTWATCH 01. NIGHTWATCH 01 will always welcome these aircraft into the net but in all cases the AWACS operator will beg off, saying that he is just conducting a connectivity check, and go. This activity has been most noticable during 1998 (but not earlier - it was apparently much rarer earlier).
Net frequencies: As of 01 Jun 1996, the NIGHTWATCH nets utilize the "ZULU" bandplan. This bandplan appears to bring the net activity into compliance with the 3khz spacing required in the OR sections of the HF spectrum. The bandplan appears to be a combination of certain "old" XRAY, WHISKEY, PAPA, and SIERRA frequencies used prior to 01 Jun 96, and certain "common" OR frequencies also used as apparent primary discrete frequencies by GHFS stations (frequencies such as 4745.0; 6715.0; 9016.0; 11181.0; 13242.0). Most accurate, up-to-date list will be found maintained on the web site for the World Utility Newsgroup (http://www.gem.net/~berri/wun/) - click your way to the most recent newsletter and then to the Military Frequency List maintained by Graham Tanner. There are usually two frequencies given out initially: the 'primary' and the 'secondary.' Recently, the GHFS and the nets themselves have sometimes been giving out a primary, a secondary, and a tertiary frequency. [Still heard in 1999].
There appear to be no instances of the nets using any frequency other than a ZULU designated frequency. On rare occasion some of the net players might move to a frequency such as 11244.0 for some "backchannel" chatter. The apparent TACAMO's will also sometimes move to CHARLIE designated frequencies to conduct some of their business (see the WUN web page URL above). The lower freqs seem to be kept in use for many hours after local sunrise. It's not until midday or later that they might start moving up in freq. It suggests a 'tight' net grouping. [This was true in the mid 90's during sunspot minimums, but for the second half of 1998+ the nets seem to move to 9016.0 or 10204.0 or higher by North American mid morning; in 1999 they are moving even higher]. NIGHTWATCH 01 apparently tries to keep only 2 HF freqs active at any one time; however, there have been instances where they might juggle more than 2 freqs if the players are having problems hearing each other.
NIGHTWATCH 01 will also apparently sometimes (mostly during large self-described 'exercises') setup specific frequencies for data and 'secure' activity. NIGHTWATCH 01 has also set up a separate freq (again during large exercises) as an 'intercomm' freq to be used between NIGHTWATCH 01 and 02. (5700.0 on 03/22/95 for example.) 1994-mid1998: The EAM initiators in the NIGHTWATCH nets will also simulcast their EAMs on various GHFS freqs (such as 6739.0; 8968.0; 11244.0; and 11175.0 and 17976.0) in addition to the current active net primary freq. Common frequency pairings: 8968.0/15016. Used by players (TACAMOs?) for "repeat" EAM xmsns at h+25/h+55 over a two hour window. Sometimes the players on these freqs are not yet active in the NIGHTWATCH net. 8968.0/11244.0 (11243.0 prior to Dec 94) 6739.0/8968.0/11244.0 July 98+: NIGHTWATCH 01: Usually only heard on net primary working freq but often heard simulcasting on the net secondary frequency as well. 11244.0 11175.0 (only player noted here using this frequency - rare) Maybe also 8992.0 on occasion. Callword Net working frequency and 8992.0/11244.0. 8992.0/11244.0 at h+25/h+55 usually over a 2 hour window. 2nd Callword Net working freq plus 8992.0 and/or 11244.0 and 8968.0 and 11267.0. 8968.0/11267.0 at h+07/h+37 (8968.0 was dropped as a primary GHFS freq on 01 Jul 98 and replaced by 8992.0. Which leads to the question: who is using 8968.0 at this time?) 11267.0 was a former USN HICOM LANT freq - TACAMO LANT is the presumed user.
Monitors in the U.S. Northeast usually report this freq to be at good levels (always at fair levels in Texas; often unheard on 8968.0 during the daylight hours). or 8776.0 at h+15/h+45 (+/-) 8776.0 was a former USN HICOM PAC freq - TACAMO PAC is the presumed user. Monitors in California usually report this freq to be at good levels (always fair to mostly weak levels in Texas). (8996.0 was also heard with EAM activity at the end of March 98 over a 2 to 3 day period at h+25/h+55 but nothing reported since. Suspected USN centric - the USAF usually conforms to the 3khz OR bandplan when they operate within the OR (off route) HF spectrum, and the USN usually does not [8996.0 does not conform to the official bandplan]). Since 01 July 1998 (the date on which the GHFS appeared to drop the use of 8968.0 and 17976.0) the nets appear to use only 8992.0 and 11244.0 for their EAM simulcasts - no instance of them using 6739.0 or 15016.0 for this activity since this date. (Just after the change there were at least a couple of instances where 17976.0 was heard with these transmissions but they have not been reported since the late summer of 1998). The NIGHTWATCH 0# operators do not seem to engage the nets on more than one freq at the same time, with the possible exception of voice/data traffic taking place on one freq while the normal voice traffic is active on another freq (suggesting two different operator positions).
But the multiple voice freqs do not seem to be active at the same time from any one station. (Exception: The EAM broadcaster can be active on 8992.0/11244.0 with an EAM while another operator is working net members on the net primary working frequency). Net interaction with GHFS: Finding 'working frequencies': The standard procedure apparently is for a 'callsigned station' to come up on the GHFS; call MAINSAIL; raise a GHFS station (any GHFS station) and 'request working frequencies for NIGHTWATCH 01.' After a few seconds delay, the GHFS station will give out (usually) accurate working frequencies. If the callsigned station cannot raise NIGHTWATCH 01 on the indicated freqs, he (very rarely she) will come back up on the GHFS and request a phonepatch to NIGHTWATCH 01 to work out some good frequencies. In many cases, NIGHTWATCH 01 is in what they call a 'monitor only period'. In that case, all the callsigned station can do is wait it out if nobody else is 'in the net'. There is an indication that the callsigned stations are actually aware of what freqs they are to use before they contact the GHFS. In early August 95 a station contacted THULE for working freqs, and was told that NIGHTWATCH 01 was in a 'monitor-only' period, and no designators were passed. The callsigned station then gave two designators (S310 and S312), and asked if these were correct. They were. (Rhetorical question: Is this info off something called a 'Daily Status Message?' heard mentioned and described during the March 95 exercise) GHFS frequencies used to 'find the net.'
Prior to 1996, the two most common GHFS frequencies used by new net players to find the net were 11243.0/11244.0 and 8968.0. By 1996, the players seemed to spend more time on 11175.0, and much less time on 11244.0. In 1998+ it's now very rare to find a player attempting to use 11244.0 to obtain this info. They can often be heard calling MAINSAIL on 11244.0 with no response from any GHFS station.
Calling StratComm Wing ONE: Periodically, participants will show up on the GHFS freqs (particularly, but not limited to, 11244.0 and 8968 [11175.0 in 1998+]) looking for phonepatches to DSN 339 numbers. Usually DSN 339 3944 prior to Oct 95, and another DSN 339 number since Oct 95 (VQ4 OPCON) [This is pre July 1998; 8968.0 is no longer in use]. The ground party was always identified as another daily tactical callsign, at least prior to Oct 95. Since Oct 95, the ground party is simply VQ4 OPCON (aka OPCON.) Maybe since 1996 or 1997 they would identify this party as COMMAND CENTER. In late 1998+ they are maybe back to using callsigns to identify these ground parties. They will place phonepatches directly to BOOMTOWN, a static call associated with StratComm Wing ONE at TINKER. These calls are usually to determine if their Whiskey Bravo comms are being properly received; and, to set up voice and data work on CHARLIE 'alphacharacter' freqs (discovered as of early 1999): CA 6691.0 (a very common freq.) CB 11187.0 CC 17982.0 CD ? CE ? CH 11264.0 CJ ? CQ ? The first three known freqs conform to the "new" USN OR freq assignments.
A good assumption is that some of the other unk freqs will also conform to those plans; and, in fact others have found heavy BOOMTOWN activity on certain other USN OR freqs with simple searches. The players in the NIGHTWATCH net will often be caught on these freqs working BOOMTOWN with voice and data. These stations are believed to be E-6A/B's with USN backend crews pulling TACAMO duty. A good number of the patches are placed to send 'immediate precedence' traffic to the ground party that consists of varying numbers of 3-element groups (trigraphs.) [This has not been heard in a year or so - 1998]. Once, the 3-element groups were heard being sent with 'slant' characters; and the 'slant' character (from context of the comms) took up one 3-element group each. In 1999 these stations are heard passing 369 message traffic via phonepatch. A good number of the patches are placed to discuss what they call TACAMO OPS (apparently sometimes shortend to TACOPS.) A good number of the patches are placed to discuss Whiskey Bravo activity. A good number of patches are placed to discuss VQ4 (and sometimes VQ3) administrative matters; parts order status; etc. [Prior to 1998 - post 1998 they are using callwords for the ground party]. A very rare number of patches are used to send FLASH precedence messages.
Sometimes trigraphs, but mostly apparently verbal 'scenarios' or whatnot. Calling PAX RIVER Usually for weather information at ETA. Sometimes for housekeeping activities. Since maybe early 1996, they describe PAX RIVER as VQ4 DET OPCON. [This activity is much rarer since 1996 or so]. NIGHTWATCH 01 connectivity checks. NIGHTWATCH 01 will occasionally pop up on the GHFS to place a phonepatch to OFFUTT DSN prefixes (that identify on the phone as the last 4 digits of the phone number; or sometimes as STRATCOM; or maybe other callsigns) for a very brief 'exercise directed check.' Also sometimes selfdescribed as a connectivity check. NIGHTWATCH 01 will very rarely use WAR46 to place these patches. Since maybe 1998 these NIGHTWATCH 01/WAR 46 phonepatches are now very common [WAR 46 will have equipment problems seeming more than half the time]. 1993/1994: They use the GHFS as 'sources' for something called an 'exercise inject' on the third/next to last Tuesday of many months. [Noticed often in 1993 and 1994 and maybe into 1995 but not heard in the last half of the 90s]. 1994 - Jul 1998: NIGHTWATCH 01 will use the GHFS to raise specific GHFS stations in order that both stations may move to a listed discrete freq for voice and (mostly) data transmissions (for 'injection into AUTODIN.') Stations heard: HICKAM; MCCLELLAN; MACDILL; LAJES. Presumed others such as CROUGHTON. Never heard: ALBROOK, ANDREWS, OFFUTT, BAYONNE, ASCENSION. [MACDILL, ALBROOK and BAYONNE are closed - 1998].
NIGHTWATCH 01 will work ANDREWS (probably VIP) for data work on MYSTIC STAR freqs (see the WUN web site for known frequencies). 1994 - Jul 1998: NIGHTWATCH 01 has been heard working MACDILL on published discretes, where NIGHTWATCH 01 will pass a verbal EAM to MACDILL 'for injection to AUTODIN.' At completion of 'exchange' MACDILL will confirm 'injection', and within seconds will bcst the thing on the GHFS along with rest of GHFS. NIGHTWATCH 01 has also been heard working LAJES with voice EAM injections, in the same manner as MACDILL. NIGHTWATCH 01 has not yet been heard working any other CONUS or non-CONUS station with voice EAM injection requests. Jul 1998+: NIGHTWATCH 01 has been heard working MCCLELLAN with voice EAM traffic to inject into AUTODIN as above. Not yet heard with LAJES (and LAJES is now [1999] somewhat limited in frequency usage [4724.0/15016.0]). NIGHTWATCH 01 will work ANDREWS (VIP) on MYSTIC STAR frequencies in data comms. NIGHTWATCH 01 will work MCCLELLAN and ANDREWS (GLOBAL; this appears to be new) on GHFS discrete frequencies for data traffic for injection to AUTODIN and to test comms from MCCCLELLAN and ANDREWS to NIGHTWATCH 01. Net activity The nets are usually more 'quiet' than active on a day to day basis. Heavy activity apparently only during lots of EAM activity. Heavy activity during self described 'exercises.' Entering and exiting the nets. Callsigned station gets working freqs from GHFS. Callsigned station goes to primary freq, and calls NIGHTWATCH 01.
If successful, callsigned station requests a check on secondary. Sometimes NIGHTWATCH 01 is not active, but another callsigned station is filling in for NIGHTWATCH 01. This backup station will perform NIGHTWATCH's duties for this procedure. Since early Fall of 1998 this no longer seems to be true except on a sporadic basis. If anything it appears that the players are unsure of what to do in the absense of NIGHTWATCH 01. A player other than NIGHTWATCH 01 will now perform the challange procedure, but it now appears to be done only at the direction of NIGHTWATCH 01 (in the event that NIGHTWATCH 01 is unable to have successful comms with the entering or leaving station). If successful (or even if unsuccessful on secondary), callsigned station requests to 'enter the net,' through the challange process. Since 01 July 1996, the "authenticators" of the challange process have changed from 2-character strings to 3-character strings with the first character either an "A", "B" or "C", and the last two characters date/time dependent. If they are 'successful' in this procedure (I've never heard one that wasn't, at least after 2 tries), then the new player is shown 'in the net' at a 'timestamp.' As of very late 1996, this is no longer true, probably as a result of the new 3-character challange process.
The player with the problem was asked by NIGHTWATCH 01 to contact NIGHTWATCH 01 by secure telephone link to complete the process. 0440z 19 Mar 96; 5700.0: CRAZYWEED attempts to enter the net with NIGHTWATCH 01. CRAZYWEED could not get the challange process right, so NW01 advised CRAZYWEED to check his date and time, and call back. That done, it still was not correct. NIGHTWATCH 01 then instructed CRAZYWEED to verify that he was using "day 19 and 0311z" (the current utc time.) That done, the challange process was successful. Exiting the net uses exactly the same authentication procedure. If the departing station cannot raise anyone, he will perform this procedure 'in the blind.' Since 01 Jul 96, players exiting the net in the blind do so using 2-character authenticators, not three (date/time dependent). During net activity (an exercise), I have heard one instance of a callsigned station saying that he has heard someone else using his callsign, and he immediately issues a 'challange.' He and the ncs immediately perform another 'authentication' procedure to verify the station's authenticity.
Stations that DO NOT authenticate into or out of the nets:
NIGHTWATCH 01 (and 02-04) Sometimes not true, at least since late 1998. NIGHTWATCH 01 was challanged into the net after a lengthy absence at the conclusion of a foreign trip by POTUS. NIGHTWATCH 02 has been issued a challange at least once in the past year. WAR46 WGY### stations. GORDO ## - extremely rare activity. Shortcallsign ## - extrememly rare activity. Since sometime in 1996, there are now cases where a callsigned station will get the working frequencies from a GHFS station; call and raise NIGHTWATCH 01 on the working frequency; but when NIGHTWATCH 01 asks the station if he wishes to enter the net, the answer is negative. Suspected TACAMOs. Possible procedure change: On 11 Dec 95 MOTORIST worked HICKAM with a phonepatch to NIGHTWATCH 01, and MOTORIST used the patch to enter the net as above with the challange process. A day or so later, Ed Griffin heard a station work HICKAM who patched NIGHTWATCH 01 and used the patch to exit the net. This is certainly easier than exiting the net 'in the blind.' However, no such event has been heard then since these logs, at least to my knowledge - they still do this stuff in the blind. Also performed at 0805z 17 Mar 96: OVERREACH (maybe) working HICKAM with phonepatch to NW01, entering the net via the patch. (Phonepatch challanges are still heard on a very rare basis into 1999).
The above information also points out a peculiar nature of the net probably having to do with the apparent fact that most players in the nets are TACAMOs (pre 1998 info). In spite of conventional wisdom, NIGHTWATCH 01 is *not* aware of the status of most of his net players unless they stay in touch with NIGHTWATCH 01 by means of periodic HF voice check; presumed WB (WHISKEY BRAVO) data circuit comms; or by means of GHFS phonepatch. He has no "backchannel" to most of his players. NIGHTWATCH 01 is often unaware that certain of his players have left his net in the blind hours earlier. A probable indication that certain of the players do not yet have the comm equipment necessary to perform these comms, and probably won't have it until they complete their "upgrade" (maybe to the E-6B) - if then. "HF Monitor-only periods" NIGHTWATCH 01 will on ocassion go into a self-described 'HF monitor -only period.' These can last from 10/20 minutes, up to hours. It has been suggested that the shorter periods are for fueling purposes, and the longer periods are for maintenance work. A recent GHFS converstation confirms the 'maintenance' guess (or, at least confirms one reason.) [written in 1995; it's much more common now to hear the reason given for monitor only periods (usually maintenance related)]. It has been noticed since late 1995 that now often certain players in the net other than NIGHTWATCH 01 will also announce that they are going into "monitor only" mode, sometimes for hours. Often, this will be announced soon after they enter the nets. It has been suggested that these are TACAMOs that are ready to assume their vlf tranmission orbits. Activity: Freqs generally quite. Usually on the primary and/or secondary freqs (but not always), the callsigned station that seems to xmit the EAMs to the net will simply pop up on freq and start broadcasting an EAM. No announcement, no general calls, just start bcsting. Sometimes, this station will then call the other players in the nets and verify that they received the traffic. Sometimes they don't, and it's these times when there may be a sense of 'disconnectedness' with these bcsts and the other players. Just a feeling, maybe valid, maybe not. Sometimes there seems to be a duality at work here, or maybe not.
Sometimes NIGHTWATCH 01 will start an EAM. At the completion of the EAM he/she will ask the players in the net if they received their 'traffic.' Sometimes (usually during the self-id'd exercises) most (maybe all) the callsigned stations will start broadcasting their EAMs - it can get very noisy and confusing during this activity. There are the ocassional voice checks in 'secure' mode using ANDVT. The first instance I caught of ANDVT comms in the net appeared in Feb 95. Prior to this, all the secure comms in the nets appeared to be in PARKHILL. Then, as if a switch was thrown, the comms were in ANDVT. As of Oct or Nov 95, for a short time in the net, there was some occasional use of PARKHILL. Not heard since maybe Nov 95. There is very rare housekeeping activities on these freqs, usually only during their rare self-id'd exercises. Chitchat about things that are not normally heard on the nets such as schedules etc. Examples: Discussion of "Full Summary Messages" (via WB); "Daily Status Messages"; etc. Note: Since the middle of 1998, there is much more technical chatter between the players often involving their GEP activity. It's suspected that this is due to the equipment upgrades on the USN's E-6(B) TACAMO aircraft. Net activity has been recently described, on one day, as 'training'. There is never any known bomber/tanker activity heard on these nets since 01 Jun 92. The nets appear to be a communications coordination (connectivity) net that exits to pass their "traffic".. The activity is daily, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
AMC testing for semi prepared runway ops increases C-17's deployed capabilities
by Bekah Clark, Air Mobility Command Public Affairs
A pallet is combat off-loaded from a C-17 Globemaster III June 20, 2009, at Tarin Kowt Airfield, Afghanistan. A recent test conducted by Air Mobility Command on semi prepared runway operations worldwide may help the C-17 be able to reach more forward operating locations such as Tarin Kowt. (U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Shawn Weismiller)
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill. (AFNS) -- At many bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, Air Mobility Command airlifters, such as the C-17 Globemaster III, are landing on dirt runways bringing much-needed cargo to forward-deployed Soldiers, Marines, Airmen and coalition partners.
These "semi prepared" airfields are rugged and to improve operations to forward operating bases, AMC tested the capabilities of aircraft landing through semi prepared runway operations to increase the capability of the C-17 to meet warfighter needs.
This summer, AMC officials conducted SPRO testing at numerous undisclosed locations around the world using the C-17 platform. In their results, they found the C-17 is able to take off and land on 65 percent of the world's soils, whereas previously it was only able to take off and land on 6 percent.
The 59 percent increase in semi-prepared airfield take offs and landings for the C-17 means more stops can be made in areas otherwise not available. As recently as June, C-17s were the primary aircraft delivering more than 300 Army Stryker vehicles to military forces in bases throughout Afghanistan.
It's through "surge" operations such as the Stryker vehicle delivery where this increase in capability is significant, AMC officials said.
The Air Force's airlift support for the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, which includes the C-17, was also recognized by Army Gen. David Petraeus, the CENTCOM commander, in August during the U.S. Air Forces Central change of command.
"Moving the mass formations of troopers and the iron mountain of materiel to perform our missions would be impossible without the phenomenal airlift support provided by the men and women of AFCENT," General Petraeus said.
Through the past three years, "crews flew more than 100,000 airlift sorties, moved more than 2 million personnel, delivered nearly 300,000 tons of cargo, and executed almost 2,000 airdrops throughout the CENTCOM AOR," he added.
Through SPRO testing, the dramatic capability increase of the C-17 was made possible by an additional piece of equipment, called a grip tester, that measures friction, said Maj. James Hill, the Chief of the Aircraft Test Management Branch at AMC headquarters at Scott Air Force Base, Ill. AMC, in an ongoing effort to continue to advance efficiencies while maintaining operational effectiveness, requested the test be performed to improve the C-17's overall mission.
"The C-17 SPRO test results will translate into expanded capability since rainy or wet weather conditions won't be such a limiting factor at austere locations with semi-prepared or dirt runways," Major Hill said.
The test results translate to customers being more likely to "get the goods" they need to complete their respective missions. Such deliveries might involve resupplying a forward operating base with ammunition, food, equipment parts or even everyday supplies such as toilet paper or light bulbs.
"Sometimes you have to get a little dirty to advance mobility capability," said Col. John Scorsone, the director of AMC Test and Evaluation. "This test effort will clear a path to future austere landing operations for the C-17."
The test evaluated how C-17s can fly into more restrictive locations and areas under varying weather conditions in an effort to best meet the needs of the warfighter as well as providing rapid response at home and abroad in response to humanitarian relief operations, Colonel Scorsone said.
Testing also evaluated C-17 takeoffs and landings in dry and various wet conditions, and increased the aircraft's operating weight capacity by 41,000 pounds.
"This payload increase allows more people and cargo to be transported at one time, possibly reducing the number of flights necessary to get supplies and troops to theater," Colonel Scorsone said. "Extra payload can also equate into more fuel the C-17 is able to carry, adding capability and flexibility to the aircraft."
The 140 flight-hour test involved flying multiple sorties to dirt strips around the country was an effort to characterize how different soil types hold up under multiple C-17 operations into and out of the particular ground environment.
The takeoffs and landings were evaluated by whether or not the aircraft had the distance and speed to takeoff or land as determined by a mission computer. The mission computer takes into account aircraft weight and environmental conditions. If the test dirt strip met the requirements as dictated by the mission computer, a test takeoff and landing were conducted.
To determine ground conditions, aircrews use a runway condition reading to determine the moisture levels of the ground, Major Hill said. The lower the number of an RCR, the higher the moisture content, the higher number of an RCR, the lower the moisture content. An RCR of 20 represents a relatively dry surface, while an RCR of four represents a surface as slick as ice.
Before this test, if any moisture was present on the dirt strip, ground personnel had to use an overly restrictive RCR rating of four which significantly limited the C-17's flexibility. If no moisture was present, an RCR rating of 20 was used, thereby increasing the C-17s velocity and capacity to deliver our mission to the warfighter as well as assist nations in need.
After this test, with the help of the grip tester, ground personnel will have a range of RCRs they can designate on a strip of land, making it a more usable runway.
"This testing allows us to determine a range of RCRs from four to 20, which will improve our overall ability to operate into otherwise overly restrictive locations," Major Hill said. "We will be able to get into more locations under varying weather conditions.
According to the test report, all test objectives were met. A final decision on equipment available to ground personnel to use is still pending until results are briefed to the AMC Operations Directorate.
A pallet is combat off-loaded from a C-17 Globemaster III June 20, 2009, at Tarin Kowt Airfield, Afghanistan. A recent test conducted by Air Mobility Command on semi prepared runway operations worldwide may help the C-17 be able to reach more forward operating locations such as Tarin Kowt. (U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Shawn Weismiller)SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill. (AFNS) -- At many bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, Air Mobility Command airlifters, such as the C-17 Globemaster III, are landing on dirt runways bringing much-needed cargo to forward-deployed Soldiers, Marines, Airmen and coalition partners.
These "semi prepared" airfields are rugged and to improve operations to forward operating bases, AMC tested the capabilities of aircraft landing through semi prepared runway operations to increase the capability of the C-17 to meet warfighter needs.
This summer, AMC officials conducted SPRO testing at numerous undisclosed locations around the world using the C-17 platform. In their results, they found the C-17 is able to take off and land on 65 percent of the world's soils, whereas previously it was only able to take off and land on 6 percent.
The 59 percent increase in semi-prepared airfield take offs and landings for the C-17 means more stops can be made in areas otherwise not available. As recently as June, C-17s were the primary aircraft delivering more than 300 Army Stryker vehicles to military forces in bases throughout Afghanistan.
It's through "surge" operations such as the Stryker vehicle delivery where this increase in capability is significant, AMC officials said.
The Air Force's airlift support for the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, which includes the C-17, was also recognized by Army Gen. David Petraeus, the CENTCOM commander, in August during the U.S. Air Forces Central change of command.
"Moving the mass formations of troopers and the iron mountain of materiel to perform our missions would be impossible without the phenomenal airlift support provided by the men and women of AFCENT," General Petraeus said.
Through the past three years, "crews flew more than 100,000 airlift sorties, moved more than 2 million personnel, delivered nearly 300,000 tons of cargo, and executed almost 2,000 airdrops throughout the CENTCOM AOR," he added.
Through SPRO testing, the dramatic capability increase of the C-17 was made possible by an additional piece of equipment, called a grip tester, that measures friction, said Maj. James Hill, the Chief of the Aircraft Test Management Branch at AMC headquarters at Scott Air Force Base, Ill. AMC, in an ongoing effort to continue to advance efficiencies while maintaining operational effectiveness, requested the test be performed to improve the C-17's overall mission.
"The C-17 SPRO test results will translate into expanded capability since rainy or wet weather conditions won't be such a limiting factor at austere locations with semi-prepared or dirt runways," Major Hill said.
The test results translate to customers being more likely to "get the goods" they need to complete their respective missions. Such deliveries might involve resupplying a forward operating base with ammunition, food, equipment parts or even everyday supplies such as toilet paper or light bulbs.
"Sometimes you have to get a little dirty to advance mobility capability," said Col. John Scorsone, the director of AMC Test and Evaluation. "This test effort will clear a path to future austere landing operations for the C-17."
The test evaluated how C-17s can fly into more restrictive locations and areas under varying weather conditions in an effort to best meet the needs of the warfighter as well as providing rapid response at home and abroad in response to humanitarian relief operations, Colonel Scorsone said.
Testing also evaluated C-17 takeoffs and landings in dry and various wet conditions, and increased the aircraft's operating weight capacity by 41,000 pounds.
"This payload increase allows more people and cargo to be transported at one time, possibly reducing the number of flights necessary to get supplies and troops to theater," Colonel Scorsone said. "Extra payload can also equate into more fuel the C-17 is able to carry, adding capability and flexibility to the aircraft."
The 140 flight-hour test involved flying multiple sorties to dirt strips around the country was an effort to characterize how different soil types hold up under multiple C-17 operations into and out of the particular ground environment.
The takeoffs and landings were evaluated by whether or not the aircraft had the distance and speed to takeoff or land as determined by a mission computer. The mission computer takes into account aircraft weight and environmental conditions. If the test dirt strip met the requirements as dictated by the mission computer, a test takeoff and landing were conducted.
To determine ground conditions, aircrews use a runway condition reading to determine the moisture levels of the ground, Major Hill said. The lower the number of an RCR, the higher the moisture content, the higher number of an RCR, the lower the moisture content. An RCR of 20 represents a relatively dry surface, while an RCR of four represents a surface as slick as ice.
Before this test, if any moisture was present on the dirt strip, ground personnel had to use an overly restrictive RCR rating of four which significantly limited the C-17's flexibility. If no moisture was present, an RCR rating of 20 was used, thereby increasing the C-17s velocity and capacity to deliver our mission to the warfighter as well as assist nations in need.
After this test, with the help of the grip tester, ground personnel will have a range of RCRs they can designate on a strip of land, making it a more usable runway.
"This testing allows us to determine a range of RCRs from four to 20, which will improve our overall ability to operate into otherwise overly restrictive locations," Major Hill said. "We will be able to get into more locations under varying weather conditions.
According to the test report, all test objectives were met. A final decision on equipment available to ground personnel to use is still pending until results are briefed to the AMC Operations Directorate.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Leap Frogs Perform at BMX Supercross World Cup
By Lt. Lori A. Campbell, Naval Special Warfare Public Affairs
CHULA VISTA, Calif. (NNS) -- More than 3,000 BMX riders and fans watched the Navy Parachute Team, the Leap Frogs, perform during the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) BMX Supercross World Cup held at the U.S. Olympic Training Center (OTC) in Chula Vista, Calif., Sept. 19.
The event brought together BMX riders from 29 states and three countries to compete in the American Bicycle Association U.S Nationals, held in conjunction with the UCI World Cup.
The atmosphere was electric. Riders from age 6 to 60 whizzed around the new, purpose-built track catching air over every bump.
The biking action paused for a few minutes as the Leap Frogs parachuted down giving an incredible display of precision team work. Two jumpers performed a high-speed diamond track formation and reached approximately 180 miles per hour, while other jumpers gracefully circled down trailing bright colored smoke.
"We're excited to have the military present and be a part of this event," said Dave Stow, associate director of the U.S. OTC. "This event was a great event to reach out to the international community, the city of Chula Vista, the military, Olympic Training Center and the sport of BMX."
The last jumper touched down in unison with the ending of the national anthem, sung by Musician 3rd Class Ashely Monroig from Navy Band Southwest.
Shortly after the Leap Frogs' arrival, the parachute team met with spectators to talk about their experiences at Naval Special Warfare. Navy recruiters from Navy Recruiting District San Diego also answered questions about officer and enlisted career paths in the Navy.
"These athletes could be a great fit at Naval Special Warfare one day," said Chief Special Warfare Boat Operator (SWCC) J.C. Ledbetter, the senior enlisted member of the Leap Frogs. "It has obviously taken hard work and dedication for these riders to get to this competitive level. That's the kind of commitment it takes for guys to make it to the [special warfare] teams."
For more information about the Navy Parachute Team, visit www.leapfrogs.navy.mil, or for information about Naval Special Warfare programs, visit www.sealswcc.com.
Navy Transfers UNREP Oiler to Chilean Navy
WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Ex-Andrew J. Higgins (T-AO 190) departed Suisun Bay, Calif., Sept. 24 and is in tow to Atlantic Marine Alabama shipyard in Mobile, Ala., where the ship will undergo approximately three months of reactivation before joining the Chilean navy early next year.
Ownership of the former U.S. Navy oiler was officially transferred to Chile in May 2009 under a foreign military sales agreement.
"The transfer of ex-Andrew J. Higgins to Chile is an important step in reinforcing confidence and camaraderie between our navies," said Rear Adm. Jim McManamon, deputy commander for Surface Warfare at Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). "We look forward to working with other international partners to promote the Navy's maritime strategy."
The transfer of ex-Andrew J. Higgins, which was removed from U.S. naval service 13 years ago, represents the optimum method of ship disposal, eliminating storage and maintenance costs and providing our allies with affordable near-term solutions.
While ex-Andrew J. Higgins is in the shipyard, her crew will train at U.S. schools and aboard ship in the areas of operation and maintenance, fire fighting, damage control and underway replenishment.
The ship and its crew of 135 are scheduled to depart for Chile in February 2010. The ship will eventually join the Chilean navy fleet as AO Montt.
Ex-Andrew J. Higgins, a Kaiser-class underway replenishment oiler formerly operated by Military Sealift Command, provided underway replenishment of fuel to U.S. Navy ships and jet fuel for aircraft aboard carriers from 1987 to 1996.
Ownership of the former U.S. Navy oiler was officially transferred to Chile in May 2009 under a foreign military sales agreement.
"The transfer of ex-Andrew J. Higgins to Chile is an important step in reinforcing confidence and camaraderie between our navies," said Rear Adm. Jim McManamon, deputy commander for Surface Warfare at Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). "We look forward to working with other international partners to promote the Navy's maritime strategy."
The transfer of ex-Andrew J. Higgins, which was removed from U.S. naval service 13 years ago, represents the optimum method of ship disposal, eliminating storage and maintenance costs and providing our allies with affordable near-term solutions.
While ex-Andrew J. Higgins is in the shipyard, her crew will train at U.S. schools and aboard ship in the areas of operation and maintenance, fire fighting, damage control and underway replenishment.
The ship and its crew of 135 are scheduled to depart for Chile in February 2010. The ship will eventually join the Chilean navy fleet as AO Montt.
Ex-Andrew J. Higgins, a Kaiser-class underway replenishment oiler formerly operated by Military Sealift Command, provided underway replenishment of fuel to U.S. Navy ships and jet fuel for aircraft aboard carriers from 1987 to 1996.
BHR Departs San Diego for Deployment
Sailors and embarked Marines man the rails as the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) gets underway from Naval Base San Diego. Bonhomme Richard and the embarked 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit departed on a regularly scheduled western Pacific deployment. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class John J. Siller /Released)
By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class (SW) Porter Anderson, Navy Public Affairs Support Element West
SAN DIEGO (NNS) -- USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6), with more than 4,500 Sailors and Marines, departed Naval Base San Diego Sept. 24, for a regularly scheduled deployment to the Western Pacific and the Middle East.
Bonhomme Richard was delayed a week before deploying in order to correct engineering maintenance issues. Deficiencies were discovered that were best corrected pier-side before commencing with Bonhomme Richard's deployment.
A team from Norfolk Naval Shipyard was immediately flown to San Diego to begin repairs to the generators.
"I appreciate the efforts of the shipyard repair team, who have done a phenomenal job working around the clock to make repairs so that we can take this magnificent warship to sea safely and do our nation's bidding," said Capt. John Funk, Bonhomme Richard's commanding officer. "I also appreciate the efforts of every Sailor on board Bonhomme Richard for supporting the repair team while being flexible and maintaining our focus during the last several days."
Many of the Sailors aboard Bonhomme Richard are deploying for the first time in their Navy careers.
"I am both excited and sad to be deploying," said Seaman Jesus Molina, part of Bonhomme Richard's deck department, and deploying for the first time. "It's sad because I am leaving my six-week old baby and wife, but exciting to be able to see the world and prepare for my future in the Navy."
There are a number of deployment veterans who can give advice and support to those Sailors and Marines who are deploying for their first time.
"I know it can get rough out there when we are deployed," said Gunner's Mate 3rd Class William Payne, a deployment veteran aboard Bonhomme Richard and a member of weapons department. "The days are long, and the weeks fly by and once you hit the halfway mark, time starts to blur, and nothing, I mean nothing can ever compare to the feeling you get during the ship's homecoming. Seeing your friends and family on the pier after six months of hard work, that is what helped me get through the last deployment."
Bonhomme Richard's mission while deployed will be to support and maintain the Navy's Maritime Strategy to promote peace and security throughout the region.
"The war has continued to progress, and we have now an opportunity to contribute," said Capt. Rodney Clark, Amphibious Squadron 7 commander. "We bring the combatant commander a range of capabilities, so when we are called upon, they can come to us for anything from humanitarian missions to kinetic operations, and we are ready."
The Bonhomme Richard Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) with Bonhomme Richard as the flagship will also deploy with USS Cleveland (LPD 7) and USS Rushmore (LSD 47).
In addition to its ships, the ARG consists of the command element, Commander, Amphibious Squadron 7; Tactical Air Control Squadron 12, Det. 1; The "Wild Cards" of Helicopter Sea Combat 23, Det. 3; Assault Craft Unit (ACU) 1, Det. B; ACU 5, Det. F; Beachmaster Unit 1, Det. B; and Fleet Surgical Team 9.
USS Stout Completes Deployment, Highlights BMD Capability
Linehandlers traverse the deck of the U.S.Navy’s Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer USS Stout (DDG 55) while taking up slack during an underway replenishment with the Cimarron Class Oiler USS Merrimack (AO(J)179) while transiting eastward in the Atlantic Ocean. USS Stout, commanded by CDR David Thorson, is part of the George Washington Battle Group. Members of the battle group departed their homeports in late January for a scheduled six-month deployment to the Mediterranean. Once on station as part the U.S. Navy’s Sixth Fleet, they will patrol the waters of the Adriatic in support of NATO Operation Joint Endeavor. Official U.S. Navy photo by Airman Joe Hendricks (Released) NORFOLK (NNS) -- The guided-missile destroyer USS Stout (DDG 55) returned to Norfolk Va., earlier this month, following a six-month deployment to the 6th Fleet Area of Operations in support of Navy Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), maritime domain awareness, and theater security cooperation.
During this deployment Stout completed the inaugural Navy Ballistic Missile Defense deployment in the European Command (EUCOM) Area of Responsibility. Stout is one of only two ships, along with USS Ramage (DDG 61), on the east coast with BMD capability.
"BMD is definitely in high demand," said Cmdr. Mark J. Oberley, commanding officer of USS Stout. "Our last deployment to the European theater was specifically to provide a ballistic missile defense capability to EUCOM if needed. We deployed independently in support of this mission. Independent deployments are fairly routine. Historically U.S. Navy ships have deployed independently, going out on single deployments for multiple engagements around the world."
Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, visited Stout on Sept. 23 and praised her crew for their successful mission in 6th Fleet, and the importance of Stout's BMD capability in support of global mission requirements.
"The global BMD mission and the capabilities provided by USS Stout and her fine crew are more important now than ever before," said Chilton. "These capabilities are proven and highly adaptable to the security environment we currently face. Stout's very successful deployment in 6th Fleet is testament to the crew's tremendous professionalism, their readiness, and their resolve to carry out the BMD mission anytime they are called upon."
Stout deployed from Norfolk in March, and traveled through or operated in the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Aegean Sea, Ionian Sea, and Black Sea. When not at sea, Stout executed cooperative maritime security training and theater security cooperation missions ashore during port visits to Israel, Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, and Turkey.
There are 18 ships equipped with Aegis BMD, and all but Stout and Ramage are currently based in the Pacific. By the end of Fiscal Year 2010, the Navy will have 21 BMD-capable Aegis ships, and is building towards 32 ships in 2015.
The three ships already set to get upgrades are the cruisers Vella Gulf and Monterey, based at Naval Station Norfolk, Va., and the destroyer The Sullivans, based at Naval Station Mayport, Fla. The six additional ships haven't been named.
Navy ships on Ballistic Missile Defense patrol have the ability to detect and track ballistic missiles of all ranges, including Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and report track data to the missile defense system. This capability shares tracking data to cue other missile defense sensors and provides data to aim and fire Ground-based Midcourse Defense interceptors located at Fort Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.
Stout is the 4th ship in the Arleigh Burke Class of Aegis guided missile destroyers. These highly-capable, multi-mission ships conduct a variety of operations, from peacetime presence and crisis management to sea control and power projection, in support of the National Maritime Strategy. The ship has a crew of approximately 300 Sailors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)